Top Cannabis Investment News, Member Posts, Cannabis Investment Daily Indices and more!

3yrs ago Cannabis harrisbricken Views: 415

-

This November 2020 election, cannabis legalization initiatives will appear on the ballots of five states: Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey and South Dakota. Every Sunday until November 3, Canna Law Blog will publish a post centered on one of these state ballot initiatives, and the current laws surrounding cannabis in that state. Today is the third post, in which we discuss the two measures concerning cannabis that will be on the Montana ballot this November: Initiative 190, known as the Marijuana Legalization and Tax Initiative (2020), and CI-118, or the Allow for a Legal Age for Marijuana Amendment (2020).

What are the current laws surrounding cannabis in Montana?

Recreational cannabis is illegal in Montana. However, in 2004 Montanans voted to legalize cannabis for medical use, with 62 percent of voters in approval of the Medical Marjuana Allowance Act. The Medical Marijuana Allowance Act allowed patients with painful and debilitating conditions to produce and use cannabis.

Despite the large majority of Montana voters who voted in favor of the Medical Marijuana Allowance Act, the State legislature has since attempted to dismantle and limit the law. In 2011, the Montana State House of Representatives voted to repeal the law, but the bill was vetoed by then Governor Brian Schweitzer. Later that year, however, the State Senate successfully passed Senate Bill 423 (SB 423) which reformed the Medical Marijuana Allowance Act, imposing stricter regulations on the medical cannabis industry and patients.

These regulations included definitions for what conditions qualified a patient for medical cannabis use and allowed patients to decide whether to grow cannabis themselves or to designate a provider (someone to grow and supply their cannabis). Under SB 423, providers could supply cannabis to up to three patients while prohibiting them from receiving anything in exchange. Other reforms included banning advertisements for medical cannabis, procedures to review doctors who frequently prescribed cannabis to patients, and giving local governments more regulatory power over the cannabis industry.

A veto referendum to block SB 423 appeared on the 2012 Montana ballot, which would have removed the regulations imposed by the Senate. However, the majority of Montana voters decided to uphold the bill. In 2016, however, Montanans voted to pass Initiative 182, Montana Medical Marijuana Initiative, removing the regulations imposed by SB 423. Under the Montana Medical Marijuana Act, providers would no longer be limited to only three patients and could also employ others to help them with growing and distribution. While the new law required annual inspections of cannabis facilities by the state, it also outlawed unannounced inspections by law enforcement.

What are the ballot initiatives this coming election?

The Montana ballot will feature two cannabis related measures this November. The first, Initiative 190, or the Marijuana Legalization and Tax Initiative, would legalize cannabis for recreational use. In short, if passed, the Marijuana Legalization and Tax Initiative would legalize possession and use of recreational cannabis for adults 21 and older. Purchases of cannabis would also be taxed 20 percent by the state and the Department of Revenue would be tasked with creating regulations for cannabis businesses. Additionally, individuals convicted of certain cannabis-related crimes would qualify for having their records expunged or for being resentenced.

The second, CI-118, or the Allow for a Legal Age for Marijuana Amendment, is an initiated constitutional amendment which would change the Montana state constitution to allow a legal age to be set for the consumption and purchase of cannabis, similar to how alcohol is regulated.

Prospects of the passage of Initiative 190 and Initiated Constitutional Amendment 118

The prospect of passage of these two initiatives seems likely, but not certain. When asked about whether recreational cannabis should be legal in a February poll, 54 percent of respondents said yes while only 37 percent said no. A September poll shows the margin to be smaller, 49 percent of respondents said they would vote yes on the initiatives and 39 percent said they would vote no. Additionally, the fact that Montana legalized cannabis for medical use in 2004, ahead of the curve as only the 10th state to do so, perhaps suggests that Montana voters will be more open to pro-legalization measures.

For previous coverage in this series, check out the following:

Montana Cannabis Legalization Guide (Initiative 190 and CI-118) on Harris Bricken.


Today's Cannabis Investment Headlines:

Log In for More
Access Over 250K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
Not a member yet?

Join AlphaMaven

The Premier Alternative Investment
Research and Due Diligence Platform for Investors

Free Membership for Qualified Investors and Industry Participants
  • Easily Customize Content to Match Your Investment Preferences
  • Breaking News 24/7/365
  • Daily Newsletter & Indices
  • Alternative Investment Listings & LeaderBoards
  • Industry Research, Due Diligence, Videos, Webinars, Events, Press Releases, Market Commentary, Newsletters, Fact Sheets, Presentations, Investment Mandates, Video PitchBooks & More!
  • Company Directory
  • Contact Directory
  • Member Posts & Publications
  • Alpha University Video Series to Expand Investor Knowledge
  • AUM Accelerator Program (designed for investment managers)
  • Over 450K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
ALL ALPHAMAVEN CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTENT POSTED BY MEMBERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OR BELIEFS OF ALPHAMAVEN AND HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ALPHAMAVEN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FOR INVESTMENT. THE MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY INTERESTS OF ANY FUND OR ANY OTHER SECURITIES. ANY SUCH OFFERINGS CAN BE MADE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE INVESTMENT'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM. PRIOR TO INVESTING, INVESTORS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED THEREIN), THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS, TO ASK SUCH QUESTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AND TO DISCUSS ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTMENT IN THE FUND WITH THEIR LEGAL AND TAX ADVISERS IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT.