Top Cannabis Investment News, Member Posts, Cannabis Investment Daily Indices and more!

3yrs ago Cannabis harrisbricken Views: 226

-

 

Last Thursday, Hilary Bricken, Griffen Thorne, and I put on a free webinar to answer all your California cannabis questions and while we did our best, we ran out of time to answer all of the excellent questions that were posed by attendees.

One of the questions that was posed–and we get this question all the time from clients and potential clients looking to enter the California market–was whether we knew of any cities or counties that are currently open for licensing (particularly retail), or whether we knew of any cities or counties currently under a ban on commercial cannabis activity that will be opening up for licensing in the imminent future. Coincidentally, Marijuana Business Daily released a perfectly-timed rundown of some of the local jurisdictions in California that may be welcoming cannabis businesses in the near future.

Currently, approximately 2/3 of the local jurisdictions in California have instituted local bans of varying degrees on commercial cannabis activity. Lack of access to safe and legal cannabis to this degree does little to undermine the existing black market, and we’re hopeful that the financial incentives, at the very least, will entice many local governments to rethink their current policies. According to Marijuana Business Daily’s rundown, below are some of the local jurisdictions that may do just that.

Anaheim, CA

Current city regulations prohibit the sale, commercial cultivation, and processing of both adult-use and medicinal cannabis. The Anaheim City Council has taken interest in changing the ordinance and putting the issue to voters and at their meeting scheduled for June 9th, “is set to consider approval of the first and second steps in a three-step process toward legalizing, taxing and regulating commercial cannabis distribution, manufacturing, cultivation, retail sales, deliveries and testing laboratories.” The proposed ordinance would limit permits for cannabis retailers, cultivators, manufacturers, and distributors to 20 in each category.

Chico, CA

Commercial cannabis activity in Chico is currently prohibited, and an ordinance introduced and given pre-approval by the City Council in February would allow for commercial cannabis activity (with the exception of cultivation and microbusinesses). The ordinance would allow up to four retail stores, and would not cap manufacturing, distribution, or testing lab licenses.

Concord, CA

The city amended its cannabis ordinance on May 26th, and will begin offering the following license types, with limits, on a first-come first-served basis as of June 25, 2020: manufacturing, distribution, testing laboratories, and microbusinesses.

Crescent City, CA

The City Council adopted an ordinance on April 6th that will regulate certain commercial cannabis activities, including storefront retail, delivery, cultivation (indoor), non-volatile manufacturing, processing, distribution, microbusinesses, and testing labs.

El Monte, CA

Licensing for retail, cultivation, distribution, manufacturing, and testing labs is currently open through June 15th, and storefront retail licenses will be capped at six.

Fresno

City Council voted in January to authorize at least 14 retail storefronts, which could be increased to 21.

King City

On February 25th the City Council adopted an ordinance to allow for a maximum of two cannabis storefront retail dispensaries. The deadline for submitting applications is July 9, 2020.

Los Angeles

Licensing is ongoing, but future licensing rounds have yet to be announced. Licensing in LA has been riddled with issues, as we have written about

Rio Vista

On May 18th, the City Council adopted an ordinance that will allow for three retailers, as well as other commercial cannabis business types, although the language of the ordinance is somewhat unclear. Microbusinesses, cultivators, manufacturers, distributors, and labs seem to be allowed.

Sacramento

In January, the city indicated that it was considering adding another ten storefront retail permits, although there are currently no concrete details.

Santa Barbara County

Although the process is currently on hold due to Covid-19, county supervisors approved up to six storefront retail licenses.

Tracy

The city will allow up to four storefront retail permits, and will not cap other license types. The licensing process has yet to begin, and no formal timeline has been established.

On the flip side, Kern County voters recently rejected two initiatives that would have allowed for commercial cannabis activity, which is currently banned. We’ve heard much hopeful speculation that as cities and counties recognize the potential benefits (particularly financial benefits in light of the current economic crisis and the state’s designation of cannabis as “essential”) of opening their doors to commercial cannabis activity, more licensing opportunities will become available for investors. And we’re hopeful that speculation turns out to be accurate.

New Cannabis Licensing Opportunities in California May be on the Horizon on Harris Bricken.


Today's Cannabis Investment Headlines:

Log In for More
Access Over 250K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
Not a member yet?

Join AlphaMaven

The Premier Alternative Investment
Research and Due Diligence Platform for Investors

Free Membership for Qualified Investors and Industry Participants
  • Easily Customize Content to Match Your Investment Preferences
  • Breaking News 24/7/365
  • Daily Newsletter & Indices
  • Alternative Investment Listings & LeaderBoards
  • Industry Research, Due Diligence, Videos, Webinars, Events, Press Releases, Market Commentary, Newsletters, Fact Sheets, Presentations, Investment Mandates, Video PitchBooks & More!
  • Company Directory
  • Contact Directory
  • Member Posts & Publications
  • Alpha University Video Series to Expand Investor Knowledge
  • AUM Accelerator Program (designed for investment managers)
  • Over 450K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
ALL ALPHAMAVEN CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTENT POSTED BY MEMBERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OR BELIEFS OF ALPHAMAVEN AND HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ALPHAMAVEN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FOR INVESTMENT. THE MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY INTERESTS OF ANY FUND OR ANY OTHER SECURITIES. ANY SUCH OFFERINGS CAN BE MADE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE INVESTMENT'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM. PRIOR TO INVESTING, INVESTORS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED THEREIN), THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS, TO ASK SUCH QUESTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AND TO DISCUSS ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTMENT IN THE FUND WITH THEIR LEGAL AND TAX ADVISERS IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT.