Top Hedge Fund News, Member Posts, Hedge Fund Daily Indices and more!

5yrs ago Hedge Fund hfm.global Views: 371

Given that 2018 was the worst performing year for the FoHF industry since 2011 and the third worst year, on a median basis, since HFM InvestHedge began tracking the industry in 1998, it shouldn’t surprise readers too much that assets among billion-dollar multi-managers declined.

The collective assets managed by the 67 multi-manager hedge fund firms that run more than $1bn fell to $587.3bn by the end of 2018, down from the $594.7bn managed at the beginning of the year.

The 1.2% decline marks the first time since 2012 that assets represented in the annual rankings have fallen below $600bn and represents the lowest collective total since December 2004.

It wasn’t bad news for every firm – the largest sharks in the pond continued to increase their share of the bait, with Blackstone, GSAM and Grosvenor among the firms to see their AuMs increase – but the numbers do serve as a reminder: FoHFs must be able to swim against the tide when it comes to their offerings and expertise to ensure they remain relevant to managers and investors.

Elsewhere in the magazine we look at enterprise risk management and whether managers are too focused on it these days. Willis Towers Watson certainly thinks so – it called managers out on being “obsessed” with maintaining assets in a recent white paper.

We sit down with Sara Rejal, global head of liquid diversifying strategies, to hear more about the consultant’s stance, which suggests investors allocate to hedge funds only by pushing back on fees, structuring customised products and gaining more transparency.

The suggestion that managers might be too focused on ERM is an interesting one – not least because institutional investors have ramped up their own scrutiny of managers’ operations and related non-trading aspects since the financial crisis.

As the demand for customisation continues to grow, managers should expect to face more requests from clients and prospects to tweak certain elements, whether related to fees, strategy or operations, but they should think twice before acquiescing to every demand, as such changes have ramifications across the board.

Lizzy Buss of InfraHedge cautions investors not to be too heavy-handed when trying to encourage managers to shift their investment infrastructure, precisely because of the negative outcome this can create – click here to read more.

Our Undercover IR contributor also highlights the dangers of launching new products without any consideration for market research – an omission which seems unique to the hedge fund industry.

Not as many fish in the sea on HFM InvestHedge.


Today's Hedge Fund Headlines:

Log In for More
Access Over 250K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
Not a member yet?

Join AlphaMaven

The Premier Alternative Investment
Research and Due Diligence Platform for Investors

Free Membership for Qualified Investors and Industry Participants
  • Easily Customize Content to Match Your Investment Preferences
  • Breaking News 24/7/365
  • Daily Newsletter & Indices
  • Alternative Investment Listings & LeaderBoards
  • Industry Research, Due Diligence, Videos, Webinars, Events, Press Releases, Market Commentary, Newsletters, Fact Sheets, Presentations, Investment Mandates, Video PitchBooks & More!
  • Company Directory
  • Contact Directory
  • Member Posts & Publications
  • Alpha University Video Series to Expand Investor Knowledge
  • AUM Accelerator Program (designed for investment managers)
  • Over 450K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
ALL ALPHAMAVEN CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTENT POSTED BY MEMBERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OR BELIEFS OF ALPHAMAVEN AND HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ALPHAMAVEN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FOR INVESTMENT. THE MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY INTERESTS OF ANY FUND OR ANY OTHER SECURITIES. ANY SUCH OFFERINGS CAN BE MADE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE INVESTMENT'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM. PRIOR TO INVESTING, INVESTORS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED THEREIN), THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS, TO ASK SUCH QUESTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AND TO DISCUSS ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTMENT IN THE FUND WITH THEIR LEGAL AND TAX ADVISERS IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT.