Top Hedge Fund News, Member Posts, Hedge Fund Daily Indices and more!

3yrs ago Hedge Fund dealbreaker Views: 356

Chances are, he’s done it before—and those people didn’t get their $1 million a week, either.

Hedge fund frauds come in all shapes and sizes. Some guarantee modest but literally unbelievably steady low double-digit annual returns. Others offer the same results, but on a quarterly basis. Equally bold con men report annualized returns of better than 50%, brought down by disappointing years in which they returned (well, not actually, but you get the drift) a mere 13.14%. The still more brazen offer triple-digit returns that (ought to, anyway) strain credulity.

Any of the above claims should raise suspicions among would-be investors. Promises of returns of between 1,200% and 40,000% should raise suspicions by anywhere from 100% to 4,000%, by our reckoning. Coupled with the pledge that said returns would come from “‘prime bank’ financial instruments,” those suspicions should probably have been heightened, to skepticism at a minimum. Now, if one were still interested in the opportunity, a simple Google search of the principals’ names might seem in order, one which would turn up a nearly $4 million scam “involving fictional trading of securities purportedly issued by major international banks,” but still producing weekly $1 million returns on an investment of $50,000. And still:

Recidivist David Sims, his partner, Mario Procopio, and their lawyer, Ralph Craig Greaves… operated a fraudulent scheme that raised over $1.4 million from investors…. The complaint alleged that Sims and Procopio falsely told investors they had special access to trade platforms used by governments, corporations, and wealthy investors to buy vast sums of currency, usually $500 million or more, at a discounted price. Sims and Procopio allegedly told investors they could "piggyback" their money on these large trading platforms and reap huge returns with "absolutely no risk."

Yup, 40,000% returns with no risk on mysterious instruments traded on secretive platforms by a guy sued by the SEC for pretty much the same thing 20 years ago managed to ensnare at least 13 people to the tune of $1.4 million. No one tell them about the colloidal silver.

SEC Settles with Perpetrators of Fraudulent Prime Bank Scheme [SEC]


Today's Hedge Fund Headlines:

Log In for More
Access Over 250K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
Not a member yet?

Join AlphaMaven

The Premier Alternative Investment
Research and Due Diligence Platform for Investors

Free Membership for Qualified Investors and Industry Participants
  • Easily Customize Content to Match Your Investment Preferences
  • Breaking News 24/7/365
  • Daily Newsletter & Indices
  • Alternative Investment Listings & LeaderBoards
  • Industry Research, Due Diligence, Videos, Webinars, Events, Press Releases, Market Commentary, Newsletters, Fact Sheets, Presentations, Investment Mandates, Video PitchBooks & More!
  • Company Directory
  • Contact Directory
  • Member Posts & Publications
  • Alpha University Video Series to Expand Investor Knowledge
  • AUM Accelerator Program (designed for investment managers)
  • Over 450K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
ALL ALPHAMAVEN CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTENT POSTED BY MEMBERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OR BELIEFS OF ALPHAMAVEN AND HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ALPHAMAVEN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FOR INVESTMENT. THE MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY INTERESTS OF ANY FUND OR ANY OTHER SECURITIES. ANY SUCH OFFERINGS CAN BE MADE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE INVESTMENT'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM. PRIOR TO INVESTING, INVESTORS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED THEREIN), THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS, TO ASK SUCH QUESTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AND TO DISCUSS ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTMENT IN THE FUND WITH THEIR LEGAL AND TAX ADVISERS IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT.