There was a refreshing change of pace during recent Supreme Court oral arguments, when, instead of the barely concealed hostility and opinion-by-opinion sniping that defined the Court’s sprawling tariffs decision, a few justices decided to take a beat, crack a joke, and acknowledge the absurdity of their own output.During arguments in Enbridge Energy v. Nessel, the Court briefly stepped away from the now-familiar dynamic of public judicial feuding and leaned into something far rarer — self-depre...
Continue Reading
Sign up for FREE to read the full article and access 129K+ alternative investment headlines.