I recently wrote about the ruling of a federal district court judge in U.S. v. Heppner. The gist of my article was that the ruling was a warning that materials to and from publicly facing GenAI tools were discoverable. But a ruling on the same day of the Heppner decision by a federal district court judge in Michigan appeared to reach a contrary result. But did it?The case, Warner v. Gilbarco, involved a pro se plaintiff who apparently used some “AI tools” in some unspecified fashion. Defendants...
Continue Reading
Sign up for FREE to read the full article and access 129K+ alternative investment headlines.
Alternative Investment News