HedgeFund

Thematic Spotlight: Archegos

The Intersection Of Policy And Markets

The following is an excerpt from Weiss' latest Thematic Spotlight, which focuses on timely thoughts at the intersection of policy and markets.


… Archegos was characterized as a family office, not an SEC-registered advisor, which is required to disclose its positions to both its counterparties and the market at large; one will not find an Archegos ‘13F.’


As importantly, the word “diversified” is doing a lot of work in contrasting between Archegos and other funds. Said differently, Hwang’s firm ran at a reckless level of concentration along three distinct vectors:


(1) Portfolio concentration: relatively few and highly correlated positions


Several individual positions were in excess of 10% of long market value (LMV) and the overall long book appeared to be highly correlated bets on Chinese internet firms as well as midcap US media and e-commerce companies. From media accounts, the short book was mostly index and ETF hedges which couldn’t possibly offset specific and correlated risks apart from some crude beta minimization. This was particularly true when realized risks were as much endogenous as exogenous.


(2) Position concentration: company stake sizes relative to float / daily liquidity


Hwang built effective economic ownership stakes in a whopping 10-20% range of several companies such as Baidu, Viacom, and GSX TechEdu (as evidenced by block trade sizes and the time series of swap counterparty filings). Aggregating his swap positions, Hwang would effectively be either the largest or a top 3-4 shareholder (alongside Vanguard, Blackrock, and T. Rowe Price) in many of his positions, unbeknownst to both the market and, for the most part, the management of the underlying companies. In most instances, these aggregate positions would constitute 5-10x average daily trading volume in such holdings, creating substantial effective illiquidity by virtue of the portfolio construction, despite most positions being nominally considered liquid, public equities.


(3) Financing concentration: using swap counterparties to amplify rather than spread positioning risk


Access the rest of the document by downloading here.

Send The Author A Message
Log In for More
Access Over 250K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates

Subscribe to our FREE DAILY newsletter

Please Select Industry Primary Role*
Not a member yet?

Join AlphaMaven

The Premier Alternative Investment
Research and Due Diligence Platform for Investors

Free Membership for Qualified Investors and Industry Participants
  • Easily Customize Content to Match Your Investment Preferences
  • Breaking News 24/7/365
  • Daily Newsletter & Indices
  • Alternative Investment Listings & LeaderBoards
  • Industry Research, Due Diligence, Videos, Webinars, Events, Press Releases, Market Commentary, Newsletters, Fact Sheets, Presentations, Investment Mandates, Video PitchBooks & More!
  • Company Directory
  • Contact Directory
  • Member Posts & Publications
  • Alpha University Video Series to Expand Investor Knowledge
  • AUM Accelerator Program (designed for investment managers)
  • Over 450K+ Industry Headlines, Posts and Updates
ALL ALPHAMAVEN CONTENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTENT POSTED BY MEMBERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OR BELIEFS OF ALPHAMAVEN AND HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ALPHAMAVEN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FOR INVESTMENT. THE MATERIAL PROVIDED HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY INTERESTS OF ANY FUND OR ANY OTHER SECURITIES. ANY SUCH OFFERINGS CAN BE MADE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE INVESTMENT'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM. PRIOR TO INVESTING, INVESTORS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (INCLUDING THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED THEREIN), THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS, TO ASK SUCH QUESTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AND TO DISCUSS ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTMENT IN THE FUND WITH THEIR LEGAL AND TAX ADVISERS IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT.