Key Takeaways
- • BNP Paribas surveyed 29 allocators in May 2023 managing $110 billion in hedge fund assets and $15 billion in alternative UCITS assets, with respondents allocating an average of 33% of their hedge fund book to alternative UCITS strategies.
- • Net inflows into alternative UCITS totaled $225 million over the preceding 12 months, with 36% of surveyed allocators increasing exposure while 22% decreased allocations, indicating cautious but positive sentiment toward the vehicle class.
- • Discretionary macro strategies attracted the strongest demand with 41% of respondents adding capital, followed by multi-strategy, credit long/short, and CTA strategies, each drawing interest from approximately 24% of the investor group.
- • Target returns for alternative UCITS portfolios averaged 5.99% among survey respondents, reflecting investor expectations for these regulated investment vehicles operating within the EU's UCITS Directive framework.
- • Respondents represented a balanced mix of intermediaries (fund of funds, outsourced investment offices, and investment consultants) and private investors (family offices and private banks/wealth managers), with mean alternative UCITS AUM of $522 million and median of $125 million.
Summary
BNP Paribas' Capital Introduction Group conducted a survey of 29 institutional allocators in May 2023 to assess investor appetite for alternative UCITS—absolute return strategies operating within the European Union's regulatory framework for collective investment vehicles. The survey provides insight into a market segment increasingly viewed as a bridge between traditional hedge funds and regulated investment products accessible across EU member states.
Respondents collectively oversee substantial capital pools: $110 billion in hedge fund assets and $15 billion in alternative UCITS assets. The investor base was evenly split between intermediaries such as fund of funds and outsourced investment offices, and direct private investors including family offices and private banks. This composition reflects the dual-track distribution model now common in alternative asset management. Mean AUM figures reveal significant scale disparities within the respondent group, with average hedge fund portfolios of $3.8 billion (median $600 million) compared to alternative UCITS portfolios averaging $522 million (median $125 million).
Capital deployment into alternative UCITS showed measured optimism over the 12-month period preceding the survey. Approximately 36% of allocators increased their alternative UCITS allocation while 22% reduced exposure, resulting in net inflows of $225 million. This net increase, while modest relative to total AUM, indicates growing institutional acceptance of UCITS-compliant alternative strategies despite ongoing market uncertainties.
Strategy selection revealed clear preference hierarchies. Discretionary macro strategies led demand with 41% of respondents adding to positions, likely reflecting perceived value in macro-oriented managers during periods of interest rate volatility and geopolitical uncertainty. Multi-strategy, credit long/short, and systematic CTA strategies each attracted new capital from approximately 24% of the survey group, suggesting diversified interest across different alpha generation methodologies within the regulated framework.
Investment return expectations remained modest, with respondents targeting 5.99% average returns from their alternative UCITS portfolios. This figure reflects the lower leverage constraints and liquidity requirements imposed by the UCITS Directive compared to traditional onshore and offshore hedge fund structures, positioning alternative UCITS as yield-enhancing vehicles for risk-conscious allocators rather than absolute return maximizers.
Respondents collectively oversee substantial capital pools: $110 billion in hedge fund assets and $15 billion in alternative UCITS assets. The investor base was evenly split between intermediaries such as fund of funds and outsourced investment offices, and direct private investors including family offices and private banks. This composition reflects the dual-track distribution model now common in alternative asset management. Mean AUM figures reveal significant scale disparities within the respondent group, with average hedge fund portfolios of $3.8 billion (median $600 million) compared to alternative UCITS portfolios averaging $522 million (median $125 million).
Capital deployment into alternative UCITS showed measured optimism over the 12-month period preceding the survey. Approximately 36% of allocators increased their alternative UCITS allocation while 22% reduced exposure, resulting in net inflows of $225 million. This net increase, while modest relative to total AUM, indicates growing institutional acceptance of UCITS-compliant alternative strategies despite ongoing market uncertainties.
Strategy selection revealed clear preference hierarchies. Discretionary macro strategies led demand with 41% of respondents adding to positions, likely reflecting perceived value in macro-oriented managers during periods of interest rate volatility and geopolitical uncertainty. Multi-strategy, credit long/short, and systematic CTA strategies each attracted new capital from approximately 24% of the survey group, suggesting diversified interest across different alpha generation methodologies within the regulated framework.
Investment return expectations remained modest, with respondents targeting 5.99% average returns from their alternative UCITS portfolios. This figure reflects the lower leverage constraints and liquidity requirements imposed by the UCITS Directive compared to traditional onshore and offshore hedge fund structures, positioning alternative UCITS as yield-enhancing vehicles for risk-conscious allocators rather than absolute return maximizers.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.