Key Takeaways
- • A coalition of organizations has submitted formal comment support for the EBSA's proposed rule implementing Executive Order 14330, which aims to clarify fiduciary standards for alternative asset inclusion in 401(k) plans and establish a process-based safe harbor for plan sponsors.
- • Over 90 million Americans in 401(k)-style defined-contribution plans currently lack access to alternative investments that defined-benefit plan participants have utilized for decades, creating a structural performance disadvantage in retirement asset allocation.
- • Defined-benefit plans with substantial alternative asset allocations have consistently outperformed defined-contribution plans, with evidence from a study of 1,600 U.S. plans supporting the outperformance thesis of private markets exposure.
- • The proposed rulemaking addresses longstanding regulatory ambiguity and litigation risk that have prevented plan sponsors from offering alternative investments to 401(k) participants, despite ERISA's original intent to support prudent stewardship with investment flexibility.
- • Finalizing the rule would restore parity between retail 401(k) investors and institutional investors who have benefited from years of compounding returns in private equity and other alternative asset classes.
Summary
A coalition of undersigned organizations has formally submitted comments in support of the Employee Benefits Security Administration's (EBSA) proposed rule on Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives, implementing Executive Order 14330 on Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors. The coalition urges the Department of Labor to finalize the rule, arguing that it correctly identifies and addresses the regulatory ambiguity and litigation risk that have prevented meaningful alternative asset access for retirement plan participants.
The core issue centers on a structural inequity in the U.S. retirement system. Over 90 million Americans who participate in 401(k)-style defined-contribution plans have been largely confined to publicly traded equity and bond indices, while defined-benefit plan participants have long maintained allocations to private equity and other alternative assets. This disparity has placed retail 401(k) investors at a significant disadvantage relative to institutional investors who have deployed capital into private markets for years and accumulated substantial compounding returns. Research cited in the submission, including a study of 1,600 U.S. retirement plans, demonstrates that defined-benefit plans with alternative asset exposure have consistently outperformed defined-contribution plans that lack such diversification.
The coalition argues that the retirement system has drifted away from capital market segments where value creation increasingly occurs. By clarifying the fiduciary standard and establishing a process-based safe harbor, the proposed rule would address regulatory uncertainty without discouraging plan sponsors from offering investment flexibility and choice. The submission contends this approach restores the original intent of ERISA: prudent stewardship of retirement assets while maintaining the adaptability necessary for modern portfolio construction. The proposed framework would enable plan sponsors to evaluate alternative investments using defined criteria while mitigating the litigation risk that has historically chilled such offerings in the defined-contribution space.
The core issue centers on a structural inequity in the U.S. retirement system. Over 90 million Americans who participate in 401(k)-style defined-contribution plans have been largely confined to publicly traded equity and bond indices, while defined-benefit plan participants have long maintained allocations to private equity and other alternative assets. This disparity has placed retail 401(k) investors at a significant disadvantage relative to institutional investors who have deployed capital into private markets for years and accumulated substantial compounding returns. Research cited in the submission, including a study of 1,600 U.S. retirement plans, demonstrates that defined-benefit plans with alternative asset exposure have consistently outperformed defined-contribution plans that lack such diversification.
The coalition argues that the retirement system has drifted away from capital market segments where value creation increasingly occurs. By clarifying the fiduciary standard and establishing a process-based safe harbor, the proposed rule would address regulatory uncertainty without discouraging plan sponsors from offering investment flexibility and choice. The submission contends this approach restores the original intent of ERISA: prudent stewardship of retirement assets while maintaining the adaptability necessary for modern portfolio construction. The proposed framework would enable plan sponsors to evaluate alternative investments using defined criteria while mitigating the litigation risk that has historically chilled such offerings in the defined-contribution space.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.