AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

COFI and Alternative Investment Managers: What’s Changing?

Reported by Fanews
Jul 29, 2026· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • The Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill introduces an activity-based regulatory approach in South Africa that shifts focus from business type to financial activities undertaken, fundamentally altering how alternative investment managers must assess licensing requirements.
  • • Alternative investment managers previously operating outside the licensing framework—particularly those in private equity, venture capital, private debt, and structured products—may now require FSCA authorization for the first time depending on their specific activities.
  • • COFI's licensing schedule will determine which activities trigger mandatory authorization; firms must conduct urgent assessments of their current operations rather than assume the regulation applies only to traditional financial institutions.
  • • The regulatory shift requires alternative investment managers to review whether existing financial services licenses adequately reflect their full range of activities or if additional authorizations are needed.
Summary
The Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill represents a significant regulatory departure for South Africa's financial services sector, with potentially far-reaching consequences for alternative investment managers who have largely operated on the sidelines of previous regulatory frameworks. Unlike traditional regulation that focuses on the type of business an organization conducts, COFI adopts an activity-based approach that examines the specific financial activities an entity undertakes, according to the analysis by Ignatius Jacobs and Ryno Volschenk, Regional Managers at Masthead.

This fundamental shift in regulatory philosophy has direct implications for alternative investment managers across multiple asset classes, including private equity, venture capital, private debt, structured products, and specialized investment vehicles. The critical distinction is that some alternative investment managers have historically operated outside established licensing requirements due to the nature of their activities or their business structure. Under COFI's proposed framework, these firms may now need to obtain FSCA authorization for the first time, while others with existing licenses must reassess whether those licenses adequately cover all their current financial activities.

The scope of COFI's impact will be determined by specific activities listed in the proposed licensing schedule. Firms are advised to move beyond assumptions that the regulation applies only to traditional financial institutions and instead conduct comprehensive assessments of how their particular activities align with COFI's requirements. This proactive approach is essential, as the consequences of non-compliance or inadequate licensing could be significant for alternative investment managers already operating in a sector experiencing heightened scrutiny around liquidity management and redemption practices.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Fanews COFI and Alternative Investment Managers: What’s Changing?