Key Takeaways
- • Liquid alternatives are expanding at a rate 50% faster than the broader alternatives category, driven by low central bank rates, muted traditional asset class returns, and elevated volatility pushing wealth managers toward alternative allocations.
- • McKinsey's 2014 asset management report documents that alternative assets grow twice as fast as traditional investments, establishing the structural tailwind behind the liquid alternatives trend despite 2015 fund flow slowdowns.
- • Advisors face an evolving fiduciary mandate requiring deeper quantitative analysis of individual alternative product behavior and portfolio-level effects, as the complexity and opacity inherent in alternatives strategies create compliance and due diligence challenges.
- • The expansion of both retail and private alternatives product sets necessitates that wealth managers develop stronger analytical frameworks to understand net portfolio impact and ensure fiduciary best practices adapt to alternative investment complexity.
Summary
The liquid alternatives market is experiencing accelerated growth within the broader alternatives asset class, driven by a confluence of macroeconomic pressures and investor demand. According to McKinsey's 2014 asset management report cited by Markov Processes International executives Bill McBride and Jeff Schwartz, liquid alternatives are growing 50% faster than the overall alternatives category, while alternatives themselves expand at twice the rate of traditional investments. This structural expansion reflects market expectations that central banks will maintain historically low interest rates for an extended period, coupled with depressed long-term return forecasts for conventional asset classes and persistent portfolio volatility. These conditions have prompted wealth managers to systematically increase client allocations to alternative strategies.
The shift toward alternatives—encompassing both liquid retail products and private investment segments—has fundamentally altered the fiduciary landscape for investment advisors. As alternatives penetrate deeper into advisor portfolios, practitioners are confronted with heightened obligations to comprehend individual product mechanics, strategy-specific risks, and the aggregate impact of alternative holdings on total portfolio outcomes. McBride and Schwartz, who lead MPI, a provider of investment analytics and research software to the global investment industry, argue that quantitative analysis will become increasingly central to meeting fiduciary standards. The complexity and opacity characteristic of alternative investments—including leverage, hedging mechanisms, and non-traditional pricing methodologies—require advisors to move beyond conventional due diligence frameworks.
While liquid alternative fund flows decelerated during 2015, market participants view this as a temporary anomaly within a sustained longer-term growth trajectory. The evolution and expansion of alternative product offerings available to wealth managers suggest that fiduciary best practices will necessarily adapt to address the unique analytical and governance challenges posed by alternatives. This adaptation will likely demand that advisors implement more sophisticated quantitative methodologies to evaluate product suitability, performance attribution, and portfolio correlation effects—marking a material shift in how fiduciary duty is operationalized within the alternatives investment space.
The shift toward alternatives—encompassing both liquid retail products and private investment segments—has fundamentally altered the fiduciary landscape for investment advisors. As alternatives penetrate deeper into advisor portfolios, practitioners are confronted with heightened obligations to comprehend individual product mechanics, strategy-specific risks, and the aggregate impact of alternative holdings on total portfolio outcomes. McBride and Schwartz, who lead MPI, a provider of investment analytics and research software to the global investment industry, argue that quantitative analysis will become increasingly central to meeting fiduciary standards. The complexity and opacity characteristic of alternative investments—including leverage, hedging mechanisms, and non-traditional pricing methodologies—require advisors to move beyond conventional due diligence frameworks.
While liquid alternative fund flows decelerated during 2015, market participants view this as a temporary anomaly within a sustained longer-term growth trajectory. The evolution and expansion of alternative product offerings available to wealth managers suggest that fiduciary best practices will necessarily adapt to address the unique analytical and governance challenges posed by alternatives. This adaptation will likely demand that advisors implement more sophisticated quantitative methodologies to evaluate product suitability, performance attribution, and portfolio correlation effects—marking a material shift in how fiduciary duty is operationalized within the alternatives investment space.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.