Key Takeaways
- • Boaz Manor, co-founder of defunct Canadian hedge fund Portus Alternative Asset Management, reappeared under the alias "Shaun MacDonald" at a U.S. blockchain startup after serving a four-year jail sentence for his role in the fund's collapse.
- • Manor failed to disclose his criminal background, real identity, or connection to the failed Portus hedge fund to investors in the blockchain venture, according to U.S. regulatory filings.
- • SEC allegations indicate Manor raised more than US$30 million from investors through a fraudulent and unregistered digital currency offering while operating under his assumed identity.
- • Manor co-founded Portus in January 2003 in Toronto with operations overseen by a co-founder, positioning himself as the fund's quantitative strategist before the fund's eventual collapse and his subsequent incarceration.
- • U.S. authorities documented that Manor changed his identity and altered his appearance as part of the scheme to obscure his regulatory and legal history from cryptocurrency investors.
Summary
Boaz Manor, the co-founder of Portus Alternative Asset Management, a Toronto-based hedge fund that collapsed and triggered his four-year incarceration, has surfaced at the center of a new regulatory scandal after assuming the identity "Shaun MacDonald" at a New York-based blockchain startup. According to Financial Post reporting, Manor disclosed his strategy for operating under his new identity, stating: "I typically go these days under the name Shaun MacDonald, and if anybody needs to know that my given name is Boaz Manor, I disclose it."
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has alleged that Manor conducted a fraudulent and unregistered cryptocurrency offering while concealing his true identity and background from investors. Court documents filed in the District of New Jersey indicate that Manor raised more than US$30 million through this scheme without disclosing his criminal record, real name, or historical ties to Portus. U.S. prosecutors documented that Manor deliberately changed his identity and altered his physical appearance to obscure his regulatory history and past misconduct.
Portus was established in January 2003 as a hedge fund structure novel for its time, with Manor serving as the quantitative and financial strategist while a co-founder managed operations. The fund's subsequent collapse marked a high-profile downfall in Canadian finance. Rather than remaining under regulatory scrutiny following his release from incarceration, Manor relocated internationally and reestablished himself in the blockchain sector—an industry characterized by less mature regulatory oversight during the 2017-2018 ICO boom.
The reemergence of Manor in the cryptocurrency space underscores persistent challenges in investor due diligence and regulatory enforcement across emerging financial technology sectors. His ability to operate under an assumed identity while raising substantial capital from investors demonstrates gaps in identity verification and background screening procedures that many blockchain startups implemented during the period of rapid ICO fundraising.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has alleged that Manor conducted a fraudulent and unregistered cryptocurrency offering while concealing his true identity and background from investors. Court documents filed in the District of New Jersey indicate that Manor raised more than US$30 million through this scheme without disclosing his criminal record, real name, or historical ties to Portus. U.S. prosecutors documented that Manor deliberately changed his identity and altered his physical appearance to obscure his regulatory history and past misconduct.
Portus was established in January 2003 as a hedge fund structure novel for its time, with Manor serving as the quantitative and financial strategist while a co-founder managed operations. The fund's subsequent collapse marked a high-profile downfall in Canadian finance. Rather than remaining under regulatory scrutiny following his release from incarceration, Manor relocated internationally and reestablished himself in the blockchain sector—an industry characterized by less mature regulatory oversight during the 2017-2018 ICO boom.
The reemergence of Manor in the cryptocurrency space underscores persistent challenges in investor due diligence and regulatory enforcement across emerging financial technology sectors. His ability to operate under an assumed identity while raising substantial capital from investors demonstrates gaps in identity verification and background screening procedures that many blockchain startups implemented during the period of rapid ICO fundraising.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.