Key Takeaways
- • 82 crypto projects and protocols have shut down so far in 2026, according to crypto researcher Stacy Muur as reported by Cointelegraph on October 20, and the closed projects had raised a combined $1 billion in funding.
- • Blast, the Ethereum layer-2 network that once held more than $2 billion in deposits, announced it would shut down after failing to secure a revenue model that could cover operating costs.
- • Step Finance, Radiant Capital and Satori Finance have also ended operations, citing security incidents such as a major February theft and an unrecovered 2024 hack, as well as revenue shortfalls.
- • DeFiLlama counted 100 closure announcements this year in an August study, with the most-cited cause being a failure to find product-market fit, followed by depleted funding and weak revenue.
- • Capital is concentrating in fewer projects: venture deal count fell 80% in the first half while M&A reached 87 deals, 65% above the prior full-year total.
Summary
A prolonged downturn in the crypto market and deteriorating profitability are driving project shutdowns across decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain infrastructure in 2026. Cointelegraph reported on October 20 that crypto researcher Stacy Muur counted 82 crypto projects and protocols that have shut down so far this year, including Balancer, Radiant Capital, Neon EVM and Step Finance. Bitcoin fell below $60,000 at one point this year, after reaching a record high above $126,000 in October of the prior year, and projects already struggling to attract users and generate revenue came under increasing financial strain.
Ethereum layer-2 network Blast is a representative case. The project announced earlier this month that it would shut down because it had not secured a revenue model capable of covering operating costs. At its peak, Blast held more than $2 billion in deposits but did not achieve economic sustainability. Security incidents and funding shortages also contributed to closures. Step Finance halted operations after a major theft in February, and Radiant Capital announced in June that it was shutting down after failing to recover from a 2024 hack. Satori Finance, which is backed by Coinbase, ended its service after determining that revenue would not cover operating costs.
A DeFiLlama study released in August counted 100 crypto projects that had announced closures this year, 40 of which decided to shut down in the 90 days before the report. The most commonly cited reason was failure to secure products matching market demand, followed by depleted funding, weak revenue and business pivots. The shuttered projects had raised a combined $1 billion and generated cumulative fee revenue of about $250 million. Nine of them had each attracted more than $50 million in investment, suggesting that large fundraising rounds did not guarantee long-term survival.
Capital is also concentrating in fewer projects. According to DeFiLlama, venture investment in the first half rose from a year earlier, but the number of deals fell 80%. Mergers and acquisitions totaled 87 at the time of the survey, up 65% from the previous year's full-year total, which the report characterizes as a clear industry reshuffle.
Ethereum layer-2 network Blast is a representative case. The project announced earlier this month that it would shut down because it had not secured a revenue model capable of covering operating costs. At its peak, Blast held more than $2 billion in deposits but did not achieve economic sustainability. Security incidents and funding shortages also contributed to closures. Step Finance halted operations after a major theft in February, and Radiant Capital announced in June that it was shutting down after failing to recover from a 2024 hack. Satori Finance, which is backed by Coinbase, ended its service after determining that revenue would not cover operating costs.
A DeFiLlama study released in August counted 100 crypto projects that had announced closures this year, 40 of which decided to shut down in the 90 days before the report. The most commonly cited reason was failure to secure products matching market demand, followed by depleted funding, weak revenue and business pivots. The shuttered projects had raised a combined $1 billion and generated cumulative fee revenue of about $250 million. Nine of them had each attracted more than $50 million in investment, suggesting that large fundraising rounds did not guarantee long-term survival.
Capital is also concentrating in fewer projects. According to DeFiLlama, venture investment in the first half rose from a year earlier, but the number of deals fell 80%. Mergers and acquisitions totaled 87 at the time of the survey, up 65% from the previous year's full-year total, which the report characterizes as a clear industry reshuffle.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.