Key Takeaways
- • North Carolina House Commerce and Economic Committee advanced House Bill 92 on March 5, 2025, clearing the path for state cryptocurrency investments, specifically in Bitcoin funds, following a one-day delay due to bipartisan concerns.
- • House Bill 92 would authorize the state treasurer to invest state dollars into digital asset funds, with proponents arguing the move would enhance returns on the state's pension fund portfolio.
- • House Speaker Destin Hall (R-Caldwell) defended the proposal by noting that cryptocurrency investments are not novel globally, positioning North Carolina as following an established precedent rather than pioneering untested territory.
- • State Treasurer Brad Briner, a Republican, formally notified the committee of his support via written memo, providing executive backing for the legislation.
- • The State Employees Association of North Carolina (SEANC) maintains opposition to the bill; Rep. Bryan Cohn (D-Granville) expressed concerns comparing digital asset volatility to pre-2008 financial crisis securities, advocating instead for a legislative study on the matter.
Summary
The North Carolina House Commerce and Economic Committee voted to advance House Bill 92 on March 5, 2025, a measure that would grant the state treasurer authority to invest public funds into cryptocurrency vehicles, primarily Bitcoin-focused digital asset funds. The vote followed a one-day delay during which the committee encountered bipartisan skepticism and requests for additional information, signaling initial hesitation within the legislative body over the proposal's merits and risk profile.
Proponents of HB 92 argue that cryptocurrency allocations could enhance returns on the state's pension fund, a rationale offered by House Speaker Destin Hall and supported by State Treasurer Brad Briner through written memo. Hall addressed committee concerns by emphasizing that North Carolina would not be charting new territory internationally, stating "We're not plowing any new ground in this bill. It's new in North Carolina, but it's not new across the world." This framing positions the legislation as aligned with fiscal strategies already deployed in other jurisdictions, potentially reducing perceived risk.
Opposition emerged along both partisan lines. Rep. Bryan Cohn (D-Granville) drew parallels between enthusiasm for digital assets and the excessive confidence in mortgage-backed securities that preceded the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Cohn advocated for a comprehensive legislative study before integration of cryptocurrencies into state portfolios, emphasizing that government investment vehicles typically prioritize "steady, predictable return." The State Employees Association of North Carolina (SEANC) also registered formal opposition, with representatives present at the committee hearing, though public comment was not permitted.
The bill now proceeds to the House Rules Committee before advancing to a full House floor vote. The progression of HB 92 reflects broader institutional investor consideration of digital asset allocation strategies, though significant questions regarding portfolio volatility, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term stability remain unresolved within the legislative deliberation process.
Proponents of HB 92 argue that cryptocurrency allocations could enhance returns on the state's pension fund, a rationale offered by House Speaker Destin Hall and supported by State Treasurer Brad Briner through written memo. Hall addressed committee concerns by emphasizing that North Carolina would not be charting new territory internationally, stating "We're not plowing any new ground in this bill. It's new in North Carolina, but it's not new across the world." This framing positions the legislation as aligned with fiscal strategies already deployed in other jurisdictions, potentially reducing perceived risk.
Opposition emerged along both partisan lines. Rep. Bryan Cohn (D-Granville) drew parallels between enthusiasm for digital assets and the excessive confidence in mortgage-backed securities that preceded the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Cohn advocated for a comprehensive legislative study before integration of cryptocurrencies into state portfolios, emphasizing that government investment vehicles typically prioritize "steady, predictable return." The State Employees Association of North Carolina (SEANC) also registered formal opposition, with representatives present at the committee hearing, though public comment was not permitted.
The bill now proceeds to the House Rules Committee before advancing to a full House floor vote. The progression of HB 92 reflects broader institutional investor consideration of digital asset allocation strategies, though significant questions regarding portfolio volatility, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term stability remain unresolved within the legislative deliberation process.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.