Key Takeaways
- • Polymarket odds for CLARITY Act passage have collapsed to 27% for year-end 2026, down from 82% in February, reflecting widening legislative uncertainty despite the bill's 294-134 House passage in July 2025.
- • Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan argues regulatory clarity matters more than bill passage itself, stating crypto "can survive CLARITY failing" but "can't thrive in the in-between"—regulatory limbo is keeping institutional capital on the sidelines.
- • Senate passage math remains steep: Republicans hold 53 of 100 Senate seats but need 60 votes; only two committee Democrats supported the bill, and remaining floor hurdles include DeFi treatment and stablecoin rules.
- • Institutional investors are avoiding crypto positions due to regulatory uncertainty, choosing instead to deploy capital into AI stocks at record highs rather than risk exposure to a potential regulatory setback within months.
- • Hougan's Washington contacts estimate CLARITY passage odds between 5% and 30%—a far wider range than Polymarket's 51% year-end probability, signaling deep internal disagreement on legislative viability.
Summary
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan has revised his outlook on the CLARITY Act following a dramatic shift in legislative probability metrics ahead of the Senate floor vote. In a memo released as major crypto assets traded sharply lower, Hougan reframed the debate: the bill's actual passage matters less to institutional adoption than ending the regulatory uncertainty surrounding it.
The CLARITY Act has faced a steep decline in passage odds. Polymarket traders now price year-end 2026 approval at 27%, a stunning reversal from 82% in February. This collapse reflects mounting legislative headwinds despite the bill's strong House performance—it passed 294-134 in July 2025, with 78 Democrats joining Republicans. Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott advanced the bill through committee on May 14 with a 15-9 vote after nearly a year of bipartisan negotiation, but Senate floor math remains prohibitive. Republicans control 53 seats; passage requires 60 votes, yet only two committee Democrats backed the bill. Remaining obstacles include disagreements over DeFi classification and stablecoin regulatory treatment.
Notably, Hougan's own contacts in Washington estimate passage odds between just 5% and 30%—a substantially lower range than Polymarket's 51% estimate, suggesting significant internal disagreement among policy insiders on the bill's viability. This wide probability gap itself has become the core problem. According to Hougan's analysis, institutional investors can purchase AI stocks at record valuations with regulatory clarity intact, making the crypto risk-reward unattractive when a negative legislative outcome could trigger a setback within months.
The core insight underpinning Hougan's revised outlook is that regulatory clarity—in either direction—would be preferable to extended uncertainty. "Crypto can survive CLARITY failing or rally if the bill passes. But it can't thrive in the in-between," Hougan stated in the memo. The CLARITY Act, if passed, would establish clear jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC and replace enforcement-led oversight with a statutory framework. However, the prolonged waiting period is actively suppressing institutional adoption. Hougan notes that the market has begun shifting from momentum-driven trading to more fundamental valuation, with investors increasingly rewarding protocols like Hyperliquid that generate sustainable revenue streams rather than speculative positions.
The CLARITY Act has faced a steep decline in passage odds. Polymarket traders now price year-end 2026 approval at 27%, a stunning reversal from 82% in February. This collapse reflects mounting legislative headwinds despite the bill's strong House performance—it passed 294-134 in July 2025, with 78 Democrats joining Republicans. Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott advanced the bill through committee on May 14 with a 15-9 vote after nearly a year of bipartisan negotiation, but Senate floor math remains prohibitive. Republicans control 53 seats; passage requires 60 votes, yet only two committee Democrats backed the bill. Remaining obstacles include disagreements over DeFi classification and stablecoin regulatory treatment.
Notably, Hougan's own contacts in Washington estimate passage odds between just 5% and 30%—a substantially lower range than Polymarket's 51% estimate, suggesting significant internal disagreement among policy insiders on the bill's viability. This wide probability gap itself has become the core problem. According to Hougan's analysis, institutional investors can purchase AI stocks at record valuations with regulatory clarity intact, making the crypto risk-reward unattractive when a negative legislative outcome could trigger a setback within months.
The core insight underpinning Hougan's revised outlook is that regulatory clarity—in either direction—would be preferable to extended uncertainty. "Crypto can survive CLARITY failing or rally if the bill passes. But it can't thrive in the in-between," Hougan stated in the memo. The CLARITY Act, if passed, would establish clear jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC and replace enforcement-led oversight with a statutory framework. However, the prolonged waiting period is actively suppressing institutional adoption. Hougan notes that the market has begun shifting from momentum-driven trading to more fundamental valuation, with investors increasingly rewarding protocols like Hyperliquid that generate sustainable revenue streams rather than speculative positions.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.