Key Takeaways
- • CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said in a November 3 statement that individual-equity perpetual futures can begin trading on CFTC-registered US exchanges that also meet the relevant SEC registration requirements.
- • The contracts are classified as security-futures products under an existing Commission regulation and are subject to both commodities and federal securities-law requirements.
- • The move follows earlier approval of a Bitcoin perpetual futures product on a regulated US venue and is framed as part of a coordinated CFTC-SEC approach under an interagency memorandum of understanding signed earlier in 2026.
- • The decision establishes a regulatory opening, not confirmation that brokers already offer these contracts; contract specifications, margin, eligible customers, clearing, reference prices and corporate-action treatment remain the key open details.
Summary
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said on November 3 that individual-equity perpetual futures can begin trading on appropriately registered US exchanges, according to the primary source. The statement brings a perpetual-style product, long central to crypto derivatives trading largely on offshore venues, into a supervised domestic framework for individual stocks.
A perpetual contract has no conventional expiration and uses contract-specific mechanisms to keep its price tied to the underlying asset. Applying that structure to shares raises questions around corporate actions, shareholder rights, trading halts and differing market hours. The product is a derivative rather than the share itself, so customers must understand what they own and how price adjustments are handled.
The CFTC says the products have been deemed approved under an existing Commission regulation as security-futures products and are subject to both commodities and federal securities-law requirements. Selig described the step as part of a coordinated approach with the SEC, citing an interagency memorandum of understanding signed earlier in 2026. The announcement follows earlier approval of a Bitcoin perpetual futures product on a regulated US venue.
The policy rationale is that traders may gain clearer safeguards on regulated domestic exchanges. The source stresses that regulation does not make leveraged positions safe: margin calls, volatile prices, thin liquidity and market disruptions can still produce large losses, particularly with continuous exposure. The article also notes a competitive challenge, as crypto-native traders are accustomed to continuous access and different settlement mechanics, and US venues must show their products are useful without weakening customer protections.
The article identifies the decisive details for market participants as contract specifications, margin arrangements, eligible customers, clearing, reference prices and how corporate events affect payouts. It cautions that the 'can begin trading' language does not confirm that every broker already offers the contemplated contracts.
A perpetual contract has no conventional expiration and uses contract-specific mechanisms to keep its price tied to the underlying asset. Applying that structure to shares raises questions around corporate actions, shareholder rights, trading halts and differing market hours. The product is a derivative rather than the share itself, so customers must understand what they own and how price adjustments are handled.
The CFTC says the products have been deemed approved under an existing Commission regulation as security-futures products and are subject to both commodities and federal securities-law requirements. Selig described the step as part of a coordinated approach with the SEC, citing an interagency memorandum of understanding signed earlier in 2026. The announcement follows earlier approval of a Bitcoin perpetual futures product on a regulated US venue.
The policy rationale is that traders may gain clearer safeguards on regulated domestic exchanges. The source stresses that regulation does not make leveraged positions safe: margin calls, volatile prices, thin liquidity and market disruptions can still produce large losses, particularly with continuous exposure. The article also notes a competitive challenge, as crypto-native traders are accustomed to continuous access and different settlement mechanics, and US venues must show their products are useful without weakening customer protections.
The article identifies the decisive details for market participants as contract specifications, margin arrangements, eligible customers, clearing, reference prices and how corporate events affect payouts. It cautions that the 'can begin trading' language does not confirm that every broker already offers the contemplated contracts.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.