Key Takeaways
- • iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) dominates in scale with $4.9 billion in assets under management versus Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index (NCIQ) at $206.2 million, providing substantially higher liquidity for institutional investors.
- • Both funds charge identical 0.25% expense ratios, positioning them competitively within the crypto ETF landscape, but NCIQ delivered superior 1-year returns of 45.10% versus ETHA's 37.10% as of July 9, 2026.
- • Strategy divergence defines the comparison: ETHA holds exclusively Ethereum for concentrated exposure to a single digital asset, while NCIQ tracks a market-cap-weighted index including Bitcoin and other prominent cryptocurrencies for diversified exposure.
- • Risk profiles differ substantially, with NCIQ exhibiting higher volatility (beta of 1.38 vs. 0.99) but lower maximum drawdown of 57.05% compared to ETHA's 67.91% over the trailing 12-month period.
- • $1,000 invested one year prior yielded $512 in NCIQ versus $478 in ETHA, demonstrating the performance advantage of the diversified index strategy despite higher volatility exposure.
Summary
The comparison between iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) and Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) reflects a fundamental strategic choice in crypto investment: concentrated single-asset exposure versus diversified index participation. ETHA, issued by BlackRock's iShares division, maintains exclusive holdings in Ethereum, the native token of the Ethereum network. NCIQ, issued by Hashdex, tracks a market-cap-weighted index encompassing Bitcoin and other leading digital assets, providing broader cryptocurrency market exposure.
Both products are priced identically at a 0.25% expense ratio, placing them at the competitive lower end of the crypto ETF fee landscape. However, their asset bases diverge significantly. As of July 9, 2026, ETHA commanded $4.9 billion in assets under management, substantially outpacing NCIQ's $206.2 million. This disparity carries material implications for institutional investors; ETHA's larger asset base typically translates to tighter bid-ask spreads and superior execution quality for substantial position sizing.
Performance and risk metrics reveal nuanced trade-offs between concentration and diversification. Over the trailing 12-month period, NCIQ delivered 45.10% total returns compared to ETHA's 37.10%. However, this outperformance came with elevated volatility: NCIQ posted a beta of 1.38 relative to the S&P 500, versus ETHA's 0.99 beta. The drawdown profiles tell a more complex story—NCIQ experienced a maximum drawdown of 57.05% while ETHA sustained a steeper 67.91% decline, suggesting that despite higher sensitivity to market movements, the diversified index approach provided greater downside protection during the measurement period. A hypothetical $1,000 investment in NCIQ one year prior would have grown to $1,451, compared to $1,370 in ETHA, underscoring the diversification benefit.
For institutional investors and hedge fund managers, the choice between these funds hinges on portfolio construction objectives. ETHA suits investors with conviction in Ethereum's ecosystem and preferring simplified single-asset tracking with superior liquidity. NCIQ appeals to allocators seeking broader cryptocurrency exposure with lower peak drawdowns and improved risk-adjusted returns, accepting modest liquidity constraints relative to the larger iShares offering.
Both products are priced identically at a 0.25% expense ratio, placing them at the competitive lower end of the crypto ETF fee landscape. However, their asset bases diverge significantly. As of July 9, 2026, ETHA commanded $4.9 billion in assets under management, substantially outpacing NCIQ's $206.2 million. This disparity carries material implications for institutional investors; ETHA's larger asset base typically translates to tighter bid-ask spreads and superior execution quality for substantial position sizing.
Performance and risk metrics reveal nuanced trade-offs between concentration and diversification. Over the trailing 12-month period, NCIQ delivered 45.10% total returns compared to ETHA's 37.10%. However, this outperformance came with elevated volatility: NCIQ posted a beta of 1.38 relative to the S&P 500, versus ETHA's 0.99 beta. The drawdown profiles tell a more complex story—NCIQ experienced a maximum drawdown of 57.05% while ETHA sustained a steeper 67.91% decline, suggesting that despite higher sensitivity to market movements, the diversified index approach provided greater downside protection during the measurement period. A hypothetical $1,000 investment in NCIQ one year prior would have grown to $1,451, compared to $1,370 in ETHA, underscoring the diversification benefit.
For institutional investors and hedge fund managers, the choice between these funds hinges on portfolio construction objectives. ETHA suits investors with conviction in Ethereum's ecosystem and preferring simplified single-asset tracking with superior liquidity. NCIQ appeals to allocators seeking broader cryptocurrency exposure with lower peak drawdowns and improved risk-adjusted returns, accepting modest liquidity constraints relative to the larger iShares offering.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.