Key Takeaways
- • CI Global Asset Management's Geraldo Ferreira argues Canadian institutional investors are under-allocated to digital assets because of temperament rather than opportunity, citing a gap between roughly $150 billion in US Bitcoin ETF assets and about $8.6 billion in total Canadian digital asset ETF holdings.
- • Ferreira says modeling shows even a 1-2% allocation to digital assets improves a portfolio's Sharpe ratio and risk-adjusted returns, based on lower correlation to traditional equities and fixed income.
- • Ferreira recommends ETFs as the primary institutional access route, citing custody, auditing, regulatory oversight and established counterparties that direct wallet holdings lack.
- • Canadian digital asset ETF assets are roughly 70% Bitcoin, with Ethereum, Solana and XRP making up smaller allocations; Ferreira says regulators have approved only established assets for ETFs.
- • Ferreira acknowledges the analysis is backward-looking and that adding any digital asset position requires trimming another holding, so investors need conviction in their macro views.
Summary
Ferreira said performance is the primary driver of interest. His team benchmarked Bitcoin and Ethereum against gold and the Nasdaq over a decade, tracking annual total returns, and Bitcoin outperformed other asset classes more often than any other. He cited 2023, when Bitcoin returned 153% while US large caps delivered about 26%. He also acknowledged high volatility and standard deviation that can unsettle conservative investors. His team's modeling, however, indicates that a one to two per cent allocation improves portfolio Sharpe ratios and risk-adjusted returns, with Bitcoin's lower correlation to equities and fixed income supporting its role as a diversifier and potential inflation hedge. Ferreira said correlation data supported the case even during the 2022 downturn, when most assets fell together.
On portfolio placement, Ferreira noted digital assets could sit in an alternatives sleeve alongside private credit and venture capital, or within real assets alongside real estate. Ether and Solana, given their technology underpinnings, may fit better in growth or venture-capital allocations. He stressed that any new position requires trimming another holding, and that gains can be harvested and redeployed as valuations shift.
Ferreira sees ETFs as the most straightforward route for institutions, noting that investors already trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Toronto Stock Exchange can add exposure without new infrastructure. He said ETF wrappers provide institutional-grade custody, auditing, regulatory oversight and established counterparties, none of which are guaranteed when transacting directly through a digital wallet. Bitcoin makes up roughly 70% of Canadian digital ETF assets and about 85% in the US. Ferreira said regulators approved these assets because their blockchains have proven durable, while hundreds of other tokens remain outside the ETF universe. He acknowledged a pension fund could access the broader crypto market directly but said there was little reason for conservative investors to do so.
Ferreira acknowledged that backtesting cannot predict future performance and that portfolio managers must weigh qualitative factors, including whether digital assets belong alongside private credit and private equity and whether evolving regulation is making the market safer and more transparent. He concluded that digital assets are likely to follow the US trend in Canada, saying, "It's happening in the United States, and I think it's an eventuality that may start happening here in Canada."
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.