Key Takeaways
- • The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) released a report urging Congress to reject six major crypto tax proposals, including deferrals on mining/staking rewards, capital gains exemptions, and special stablecoin treatment currently being considered by lawmakers.
- • The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates crypto tax exemption proposals alone would cost the federal government $5.8 billion in forgone tax revenue, according to testimony at a Senate hearing on cryptocurrency taxation.
- • The crypto industry is actively lobbying Congress for a de minimis tax exclusion on low-value transactions (such as everyday purchases) and exemptions on gains from cryptocurrency received through mining and staking—tax treatments not available to other asset classes or industries.
- • Under current federal law, cryptocurrency is classified as property, requiring taxpayers to report income when receiving crypto as compensation and capital gains when selling or exchanging appreciated crypto, including for purchases of goods and services.
- • ITEP's position holds that cryptocurrency has not demonstrated sufficient public benefit to justify preferential tax treatment and argues the tax code should treat crypto income and gains identically to other investments and compensation sources.
Summary
With Congress potentially advancing cryptocurrency tax legislation imminently, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has issued a formal report opposing multiple proposals that would create preferential tax treatment for the crypto industry. The report directly counters industry lobbying efforts that have gained traction among lawmakers and identifies six substantive reasons to reject special crypto tax provisions.
The crypto industry's legislative agenda centers on three primary objectives: creating deferrals for taxes on cryptocurrency received through mining and staking operations, exempting certain crypto purchases from capital gains taxation rules, and providing special tax treatment for stablecoin transactions. Additionally, industry advocates seek a de minimis exemption for low-value crypto transactions, framing such purchases as analogous to everyday cash purchases like coffee. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, these exemption proposals alone would reduce federal tax revenue by $5.8 billion—a figure that underscores the material fiscal impact of the proposed changes.
ITEP's director of federal tax policy, Steve Wamhoff, stated that "crypto has not demonstrated any public benefit that would justify creating a special set of tax rules for the industry," emphasizing that income earned through crypto should receive equivalent tax treatment to other income sources and that investment gains should be taxed consistently with other asset classes. The report argues that mining and staking rewards constitute ordinary income, that cryptocurrency remains fundamentally a speculative asset rather than a functional currency, and that stablecoin exemptions would introduce unnecessary complexity without demonstrable public benefit.
Current federal tax law treats cryptocurrency as property. Taxpayers are required to report taxable income when they receive crypto as compensation and must calculate and report capital gains when appreciated cryptocurrency is sold, exchanged, or used as payment for goods or services. The ITEP report positions these longstanding principles as appropriate and opposes exemptions that would grant the crypto sector preferential treatment unavailable to traditional investments, other financial instruments, or alternative industries. As of 2026, the IRS receives transaction reporting through Form 1099-DA and Form 1099-MISC, though reporting accuracy remains a compliance concern for tax authorities.
The crypto industry's legislative agenda centers on three primary objectives: creating deferrals for taxes on cryptocurrency received through mining and staking operations, exempting certain crypto purchases from capital gains taxation rules, and providing special tax treatment for stablecoin transactions. Additionally, industry advocates seek a de minimis exemption for low-value crypto transactions, framing such purchases as analogous to everyday cash purchases like coffee. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, these exemption proposals alone would reduce federal tax revenue by $5.8 billion—a figure that underscores the material fiscal impact of the proposed changes.
ITEP's director of federal tax policy, Steve Wamhoff, stated that "crypto has not demonstrated any public benefit that would justify creating a special set of tax rules for the industry," emphasizing that income earned through crypto should receive equivalent tax treatment to other income sources and that investment gains should be taxed consistently with other asset classes. The report argues that mining and staking rewards constitute ordinary income, that cryptocurrency remains fundamentally a speculative asset rather than a functional currency, and that stablecoin exemptions would introduce unnecessary complexity without demonstrable public benefit.
Current federal tax law treats cryptocurrency as property. Taxpayers are required to report taxable income when they receive crypto as compensation and must calculate and report capital gains when appreciated cryptocurrency is sold, exchanged, or used as payment for goods or services. The ITEP report positions these longstanding principles as appropriate and opposes exemptions that would grant the crypto sector preferential treatment unavailable to traditional investments, other financial instruments, or alternative industries. As of 2026, the IRS receives transaction reporting through Form 1099-DA and Form 1099-MISC, though reporting accuracy remains a compliance concern for tax authorities.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.