Key Takeaways
- • Southwark Crown Court ordered Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga to pay £851,402.27 in combined confiscation orders on 28 September 2026, following FCA prosecution of a fraudulent crypto investment scheme.
- • At least 65 investors lost £1,541,799 between February 2017 and June 2019 through cold-call solicitations pitching fake cryptocurrency opportunities via entities including CCX Capital and Astaria Group LLP.
- • Confiscation orders recover approximately 55% of reported victim losses, with Bedi liable for £603,404.28 and Mavanga for £247,997.99; the FCA has stated recovered funds will be returned to victims, though collection and distribution processes remain pending.
- • The scheme employed professional-looking websites and promises of high returns to market fraudulent investments marketed with cryptocurrency language, rather than evidence of genuine digital asset purchases or blockchain-based fund movement.
Summary
The UK Financial Conduct Authority has secured confiscation orders totalling £851,402.27 against two individuals convicted of operating a fraudulent cryptocurrency investment scheme. Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga were ordered by Southwark Crown Court on 28 September 2026 to make individual repayments of £603,404.28 and £247,997.99 respectively. The enforcement action concludes a prosecution related to a scheme that defrauded at least 65 investors of £1,541,799 through unsolicited cold-call marketing between February 2017 and June 2019.
The confiscation orders represent approximately 55% of the reported losses, leaving a shortfall of roughly £690,396.73. Importantly, the announced orders do not confirm that funds have been collected or distributed; collection and victim distribution processes remain ongoing. The FCA has stated its intention to return recovered money to victims, but the mechanics and timeline for such distributions have not been disclosed.
The operation marketed fraudulent investment opportunities through entities including CCX Capital and Astaria Group LLP. Perpetrators employed professional-looking websites and promoted promises of high returns to solicit investor participation. The scheme was fundamentally a fraud marketed using cryptocurrency language rather than evidence of genuine digital asset transactions or blockchain-based fund flows. The FCA's disclosure does not provide blockchain wallet trails, identify cryptocurrency exchanges used for fund movement, or detail the defendants' complete asset positions—details that would be necessary to establish whether proceeds moved through digital asset infrastructure or remained in conventional financial channels.
The case underscores the continued vulnerability of retail investors to investment fraud marketed through legitimate-appearing channels, particularly those leveraging cryptocurrency's accessibility and perceived novelty to justify implausible return promises. The partial recovery through confiscation orders, while significant, leaves the majority of victim losses unrecovered, reflecting both the challenges of tracing and recovering proceeds from complex fraud schemes and the limitations of confiscation-based remedies when defendant assets are insufficient or have been dissipated.
The confiscation orders represent approximately 55% of the reported losses, leaving a shortfall of roughly £690,396.73. Importantly, the announced orders do not confirm that funds have been collected or distributed; collection and victim distribution processes remain ongoing. The FCA has stated its intention to return recovered money to victims, but the mechanics and timeline for such distributions have not been disclosed.
The operation marketed fraudulent investment opportunities through entities including CCX Capital and Astaria Group LLP. Perpetrators employed professional-looking websites and promoted promises of high returns to solicit investor participation. The scheme was fundamentally a fraud marketed using cryptocurrency language rather than evidence of genuine digital asset transactions or blockchain-based fund flows. The FCA's disclosure does not provide blockchain wallet trails, identify cryptocurrency exchanges used for fund movement, or detail the defendants' complete asset positions—details that would be necessary to establish whether proceeds moved through digital asset infrastructure or remained in conventional financial channels.
The case underscores the continued vulnerability of retail investors to investment fraud marketed through legitimate-appearing channels, particularly those leveraging cryptocurrency's accessibility and perceived novelty to justify implausible return promises. The partial recovery through confiscation orders, while significant, leaves the majority of victim losses unrecovered, reflecting both the challenges of tracing and recovering proceeds from complex fraud schemes and the limitations of confiscation-based remedies when defendant assets are insufficient or have been dissipated.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.