Key Takeaways
- • Galaxy Digital terminated a $1.2 billion acquisition of BitGo in August 2022, citing BitGo's failure to deliver audited 2021 financial statements by a contractual July 31 deadline, amid SEC guidance complications on crypto-related filings.
- • BitGo is seeking at least $100 million in reverse breakup fees from Galaxy Digital and claims actual damages may exceed that threshold, arguing the termination caused direct harm to the company.
- • Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz testified in Delaware Chancery Court this week that U.S. regulatory probes did not affect the merger's approval pathway, directly challenging BitGo's claims about regulatory obstruction.
- • Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick will render the final decision after Delaware's Supreme Court revived the case in May 2024, with both parties presenting conflicting accounts of contractual compliance and termination rights.
Summary
Galaxy Digital Holdings and BitGo are locked in litigation over a failed $1.2 billion merger agreement originally announced in May 2021, which was characterized at the time as the largest deal in crypto industry history. The dispute centers on Galaxy's August 2022 termination of the acquisition and the conditions that led to its collapse, with BitGo now seeking compensation in Delaware Chancery Court.
Galaxy justified its termination by citing BitGo's failure to deliver audited financial statements for fiscal year 2021 in a form meeting the merger agreement's contractual standard. The company argued that new SEC staff accounting guidance specifically addressing crypto-related filings complicated the submission process and that it retained a clean termination right without owing any breakup fee. This technical contractual argument forms the foundation of Galaxy's defense.
BitGo disputes Galaxy's characterization of events. According to Bloomberg reporting on CEO Mike Belshe's courtroom testimony, BitGo maintains it provided the required documentation and that Galaxy's termination decision caused substantial harm to the company. BitGo is demanding at least the $100 million reverse breakup fee specified in the merger agreement and has indicated that actual damages may significantly exceed this amount. Belshe described the impact as "incredibly damaging" during his testimony.
Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz addressed key issues during his testimony this week, including directly contradicting claims that U.S. regulatory investigations influenced the merger's approval trajectory. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick will ultimately decide the case following its revival by Delaware's Supreme Court in May 2024. The litigation outcome will have meaningful implications for both parties and may establish precedent regarding contractual obligations and termination rights in high-value cryptocurrency sector transactions.
Galaxy justified its termination by citing BitGo's failure to deliver audited financial statements for fiscal year 2021 in a form meeting the merger agreement's contractual standard. The company argued that new SEC staff accounting guidance specifically addressing crypto-related filings complicated the submission process and that it retained a clean termination right without owing any breakup fee. This technical contractual argument forms the foundation of Galaxy's defense.
BitGo disputes Galaxy's characterization of events. According to Bloomberg reporting on CEO Mike Belshe's courtroom testimony, BitGo maintains it provided the required documentation and that Galaxy's termination decision caused substantial harm to the company. BitGo is demanding at least the $100 million reverse breakup fee specified in the merger agreement and has indicated that actual damages may significantly exceed this amount. Belshe described the impact as "incredibly damaging" during his testimony.
Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz addressed key issues during his testimony this week, including directly contradicting claims that U.S. regulatory investigations influenced the merger's approval trajectory. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick will ultimately decide the case following its revival by Delaware's Supreme Court in May 2024. The litigation outcome will have meaningful implications for both parties and may establish precedent regarding contractual obligations and termination rights in high-value cryptocurrency sector transactions.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.