Key Takeaways
- • Grayscale's Head of Research Zach Pandl projects the CLARITY Act will not pass in 2026 due to crowded Senate calendar and election-year politics, with a September 15 Senate vote looming but passage odds remaining low.
- • The crypto industry can advance without comprehensive federal legislation, having operated for roughly 17 years before the CLARITY Act was introduced; regulatory rulemaking by the SEC and other agencies can fill market structure gaps, particularly around tokenized securities and staking policies.
- • Without domestic legislative clarity, significant new investment activity and developer talent could migrate to overseas markets, representing a competitive disadvantage for the U.S. crypto sector rather than an existential threat to blockchain functionality or Bitcoin demand.
- • Recent regulatory progress—including improved institutional custody rules, clearer staking policies, expanded banking access, and growth in crypto exchange-traded products—has provided a foundation for industry advancement independent of congressional action.
- • The CLARITY Act, while described as the most consequential piece of crypto legislation in Congress, would provide less business stimulus than originally anticipated and includes contentious provisions such as bans on stablecoin reward programs that compete with bank deposits.
Summary
Grayscale Research has signaled that the crypto industry can continue its trajectory without passage of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, as the bill faces dwindling prospects in Congress. With a Senate vote scheduled for September 15, 2026, Zach Pandl, Grayscale's Head of Research, stated that full passage appears unlikely this year given election-year dynamics and a crowded legislative calendar. Rather than framing this outcome as catastrophic, Pandl emphasized that digital assets have functioned and advanced for approximately 17 years without comprehensive U.S. market structure rules.
Pandl's assessment hinges on regulatory rulemaking rather than legislative action as the path forward. He expects the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other federal regulators to fill critical gaps through interpretative guidance and formal rulemaking, particularly in the tokenized securities space. He noted that the SEC's recent interpretative guidance on the application of Federal securities laws to crypto assets represents "a big step forward for the industry." Additionally, progress from the Trump-era policy environment—including new institutional custody standards, expanded banking relationships, clearer staking protocols, and accelerated growth in crypto exchange-traded products—has created infrastructure support that reduces dependence on legislative action.
The CLARITY Act, while positioned as the most consequential crypto legislation working through Congress, would deliver less economic uplift than many industry participants originally anticipated. The bill carries contentious provisions, including requirements to ban stablecoin reward programs that might compete with interest-bearing bank deposits, elements that have complicated its path to passage.
However, Pandl cautioned against viewing a failed CLARITY Act as consequence-free. Without clear U.S. rules, he warned that new investment capital and developer activity could migrate offshore to jurisdictions with more transparent regulatory frameworks. He characterized the legislative delay as "a missed opportunity rather than a crisis for domestic crypto markets," signaling that while core blockchain functionality, Bitcoin's role as a store of value, and stablecoin payment adoption would continue unimpeded, the U.S. could lose competitive positioning in attracting emerging investment activity and technical talent.
Pandl's assessment hinges on regulatory rulemaking rather than legislative action as the path forward. He expects the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other federal regulators to fill critical gaps through interpretative guidance and formal rulemaking, particularly in the tokenized securities space. He noted that the SEC's recent interpretative guidance on the application of Federal securities laws to crypto assets represents "a big step forward for the industry." Additionally, progress from the Trump-era policy environment—including new institutional custody standards, expanded banking relationships, clearer staking protocols, and accelerated growth in crypto exchange-traded products—has created infrastructure support that reduces dependence on legislative action.
The CLARITY Act, while positioned as the most consequential crypto legislation working through Congress, would deliver less economic uplift than many industry participants originally anticipated. The bill carries contentious provisions, including requirements to ban stablecoin reward programs that might compete with interest-bearing bank deposits, elements that have complicated its path to passage.
However, Pandl cautioned against viewing a failed CLARITY Act as consequence-free. Without clear U.S. rules, he warned that new investment capital and developer activity could migrate offshore to jurisdictions with more transparent regulatory frameworks. He characterized the legislative delay as "a missed opportunity rather than a crisis for domestic crypto markets," signaling that while core blockchain functionality, Bitcoin's role as a store of value, and stablecoin payment adoption would continue unimpeded, the U.S. could lose competitive positioning in attracting emerging investment activity and technical talent.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.