Key Takeaways
- • Singapore's High Court rejected a US$5 million claim brought by Parastate Labs against Babel Finance co-founders Wang Li and Yang Zhou in Originating Claim No 130 of 2022, with judgment issued September 1, 2026.
- • The dispute arose from Parastate's investment in the Babel Group's Alpha USDT Fund, which collapsed following the cryptocurrency asset management firm's insolvency.
- • The court's decision addressed claims of dishonest assistance, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and conspiracy related to Babel's trading of cryptocurrency derivative contracts on platforms including Deribit.
- • The judgment clarifies liability standards for cryptocurrency fund operators and institutional borrowers in the wake of major crypto lending platform failures, including the collapse of Celsius and operational issues at Zipmex.
Summary
The Singapore High Court has dismissed a US$5 million claim brought by Parastate Labs against Wang Li, Yang Zhou, and Babel-related entities following the collapse of the Babel Group, a cryptocurrency asset management firm. The judgment, issued on September 1, 2026, concludes litigation initiated in Originating Claim No 130 of 2022 and addresses significant questions regarding fiduciary obligations, investor protection, and accountability in the cryptocurrency lending and derivatives trading sector.
Parastate's claim centered on losses sustained through its investment in the Babel Group's Alpha USDT Fund. The underlying dispute involved allegations that Babel's co-founders engaged in dishonest assistance, breached fiduciary duties, made material misrepresentations, and participated in a conspiracy that ultimately caused the fund's collapse. The court's judgment examines these claims across multiple legal frameworks, including equity law doctrines concerning fiduciary relationships and accessory liability, as well as common law tort principles governing fraud and conspiracy.
The Babel Group operated a cryptocurrency asset management business that engaged in substantial trading activity in cryptocurrency derivative contracts, including positions managed through Deribit. The court's decision specifically examined the mechanics of how Babel Group entities, including Babel Asia Asset Management Private Limited and Babel Holding Limited, structured and managed these investments. The case also contextualizes the Babel collapse within a broader pattern of cryptocurrency lending platform failures, including the insolvency of Celsius Network and operational difficulties experienced by cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex, which had lent assets to institutional borrowers like Babel to generate yields for investors.
The High Court's rejection of Parastate's full US$5 million claim establishes precedent regarding the evidentiary and legal standards required to establish liability against cryptocurrency fund managers in Singapore's courts. The judgment addresses critical issues including when fiduciary relationships arise in cryptocurrency investment structures, the duties owed to fund investors, and the circumstances under which individual co-founders may be held personally liable for fund losses. This decision carries implications for institutional investors evaluating counterparty risk in cryptocurrency lending and derivative trading arrangements.
Parastate's claim centered on losses sustained through its investment in the Babel Group's Alpha USDT Fund. The underlying dispute involved allegations that Babel's co-founders engaged in dishonest assistance, breached fiduciary duties, made material misrepresentations, and participated in a conspiracy that ultimately caused the fund's collapse. The court's judgment examines these claims across multiple legal frameworks, including equity law doctrines concerning fiduciary relationships and accessory liability, as well as common law tort principles governing fraud and conspiracy.
The Babel Group operated a cryptocurrency asset management business that engaged in substantial trading activity in cryptocurrency derivative contracts, including positions managed through Deribit. The court's decision specifically examined the mechanics of how Babel Group entities, including Babel Asia Asset Management Private Limited and Babel Holding Limited, structured and managed these investments. The case also contextualizes the Babel collapse within a broader pattern of cryptocurrency lending platform failures, including the insolvency of Celsius Network and operational difficulties experienced by cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex, which had lent assets to institutional borrowers like Babel to generate yields for investors.
The High Court's rejection of Parastate's full US$5 million claim establishes precedent regarding the evidentiary and legal standards required to establish liability against cryptocurrency fund managers in Singapore's courts. The judgment addresses critical issues including when fiduciary relationships arise in cryptocurrency investment structures, the duties owed to fund investors, and the circumstances under which individual co-founders may be held personally liable for fund losses. This decision carries implications for institutional investors evaluating counterparty risk in cryptocurrency lending and derivative trading arrangements.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.