Key Takeaways
- • Akil Heywood, 42, a significant investor in self-proclaimed "Crypto King" Aiden Pleterski, faces trial in November 2026 on charges of allegedly orchestrating Pleterski's 2022 kidnapping, with a dozen additional charges filed including witness intimidation.
- • Heywood has been charged with attempting to dissuade co-accused Deren Akyeam-Pong from testifying on November 3, 2025—the same day a court lifted a publication ban on evidence related to Akyeam-Pong's guilty plea in the kidnapping case.
- • Akyeam-Pong pleaded guilty to nine charges in October 2025, including kidnapping, assault, and various gun offenses related to Pleterski's abduction.
- • Heywood faces additional criminal charges stemming from an alleged street racing incident in Scarborough involving a green Lamborghini SUV that resulted in injuries to four people, including an infant, with Toronto police linking him to the vehicle.
- • The case underscores the intersection of high-profile cryptocurrency fraud allegations, investor disputes, and serious criminal conduct within the digital asset sector.
Summary
Akil Heywood, a 42-year-old investor who placed hundreds of thousands of dollars with Aiden Pleterski, the self-proclaimed "Crypto King," has been charged with a dozen additional offences as his trial for allegedly orchestrating Pleterski's 2022 kidnapping approaches this November. Among the new charges is an allegation that Heywood attempted to dissuade Deren Akyeam-Pong—a co-accused who has already pleaded guilty in the kidnapping—from providing evidence in judicial proceedings. This intimidation charge is dated November 3, 2025, the same date an Ontario Superior Court judge lifted a temporary publication ban on the agreed statement of facts related to Akyeam-Pong's guilty plea.
Akyeam-Pong entered guilty pleas to nine charges in October 2025, including kidnapping, assault, and various firearm-related offences connected to Pleterski's abduction. Through his legal counsel, Akyeam-Pong declined to comment on the new charge against Heywood regarding witness intimidation, leaving limited public detail on the nature of the alleged interference.
Beyond the kidnapping allegations, Heywood has also been charged in connection with a street racing incident in Scarborough last month. According to Toronto police, Heywood was operating a green Lamborghini SUV that was racing a Mercedes when the Mercedes vehicle lost control and struck a truck, resulting in injuries to four people, including an infant. Police have attributed responsibility for the collision to the racing activity.
The escalating charges against Heywood reflect a pattern of serious legal exposure and suggest potential deterioration in his legal position as trial approaches. The timing of the witness intimidation allegation—coinciding with the unsealing of court documents—indicates prosecutorial concern regarding attempts to suppress evidence or influence testimony in what has already been characterized as a high-profile case involving significant financial investments and violent criminal conduct.
Akyeam-Pong entered guilty pleas to nine charges in October 2025, including kidnapping, assault, and various firearm-related offences connected to Pleterski's abduction. Through his legal counsel, Akyeam-Pong declined to comment on the new charge against Heywood regarding witness intimidation, leaving limited public detail on the nature of the alleged interference.
Beyond the kidnapping allegations, Heywood has also been charged in connection with a street racing incident in Scarborough last month. According to Toronto police, Heywood was operating a green Lamborghini SUV that was racing a Mercedes when the Mercedes vehicle lost control and struck a truck, resulting in injuries to four people, including an infant. Police have attributed responsibility for the collision to the racing activity.
The escalating charges against Heywood reflect a pattern of serious legal exposure and suggest potential deterioration in his legal position as trial approaches. The timing of the witness intimidation allegation—coinciding with the unsealing of court documents—indicates prosecutorial concern regarding attempts to suppress evidence or influence testimony in what has already been characterized as a high-profile case involving significant financial investments and violent criminal conduct.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.