Key Takeaways
- • A coalition of 114 crypto organizations—including Coinbase, a16z, Kraken, and the Solana Foundation—sent a letter to Senate Banking Committee leadership demanding explicit federal protections for blockchain developers and non-custodial service providers in pending market structure legislation.
- • The crypto industry coalition is conditioning support for the bill on language that shields developers from misclassification as money transmitter operators under 18 U.S.C. § 1960 and preempts conflicting state regulations to ensure nationwide legal consistency.
- • The push comes amid Senate Democrats' consideration of language that would criminalize developers publishing software used in money laundering or sanctions evasion, creating significant friction between industry and certain lawmakers including Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
- • A competing coalition of 261 civil rights, labor, consumer, and environmental groups opposes the crypto legislation as insufficiently protective of investors and financial stability, describing it as "industry-crafted" and warning it could amplify systemic financial risk.
- • Senate leadership is advancing the crypto market structure bill toward committee markup, with Senator Tillis urging the Banking Committee to schedule a May markup to finalize the legislation despite ongoing opposition from multiple stakeholder groups.
Summary
The crypto industry is executing a coordinated legislative push to shape U.S. market structure regulation. A coalition of 114 organizations signed a letter to Senate Banking Committee leaders on Wednesday demanding that pending market structure legislation include explicit federal protections for software developers and non-custodial service providers. The coalition—organized by the DeFi Education Fund and including major institutional players such as Coinbase, a16z (Andreessen Horowitz), Kraken, Dapper Labs, Blockchain Capital, and the Solana Foundation—made clear it will not support the bill without developer protections.
The core ask centers on preempting prosecution under federal money transmitter statutes. The letter specifically demands that legislation "shield developers from being misclassified or prosecuted as operators of money transmitting businesses under 18 U.S.C. § 1960" and ensure "federal protections for blockchain infrastructure developers and non-custodial service providers." The coalition also seeks nationwide legal consistency through federal preemption of conflicting state laws. The push appears motivated by concerns that Senate Democrats, particularly ranking Banking Committee member Elizabeth Warren, may attempt to insert language criminalizing developers who publish software used in money laundering or sanctions evasion.
However, the crypto industry faces substantial organized opposition. A separate coalition of 261 civil rights, labor, community, consumer, environmental, and faith-based organizations sent its own letter urging the Senate to reject any market structure bill that fails to address systemic crypto industry failures and investor protections. This opposing coalition characterizes the pending legislation as "industry-crafted" and warns it would "amplify financial risk and loss for millions of workers and families" while imperiling financial system stability.
Senate Banking Committee leadership appears intent on advancing the bill despite competing pressures. Senator Thom Tillis has urged the committee to schedule a May markup, citing the need for additional time to finalize language. The Banking Committee's companion bill has proven more contentious than House-passed versions, with banks and crypto firms engaged in competing lobbying efforts. The legislation would establish clear jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC regarding digital asset regulation, but disputes persist over investor protections, developer liability, and the scope of bank involvement in crypto activities.
The core ask centers on preempting prosecution under federal money transmitter statutes. The letter specifically demands that legislation "shield developers from being misclassified or prosecuted as operators of money transmitting businesses under 18 U.S.C. § 1960" and ensure "federal protections for blockchain infrastructure developers and non-custodial service providers." The coalition also seeks nationwide legal consistency through federal preemption of conflicting state laws. The push appears motivated by concerns that Senate Democrats, particularly ranking Banking Committee member Elizabeth Warren, may attempt to insert language criminalizing developers who publish software used in money laundering or sanctions evasion.
However, the crypto industry faces substantial organized opposition. A separate coalition of 261 civil rights, labor, community, consumer, environmental, and faith-based organizations sent its own letter urging the Senate to reject any market structure bill that fails to address systemic crypto industry failures and investor protections. This opposing coalition characterizes the pending legislation as "industry-crafted" and warns it would "amplify financial risk and loss for millions of workers and families" while imperiling financial system stability.
Senate Banking Committee leadership appears intent on advancing the bill despite competing pressures. Senator Thom Tillis has urged the committee to schedule a May markup, citing the need for additional time to finalize language. The Banking Committee's companion bill has proven more contentious than House-passed versions, with banks and crypto firms engaged in competing lobbying efforts. The legislation would establish clear jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC regarding digital asset regulation, but disputes persist over investor protections, developer liability, and the scope of bank involvement in crypto activities.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.