Key Takeaways
- • North Carolina House Bill 92, backed by Speaker Destin Hall (R-Caldwell), would authorize the state treasurer to invest up to 10% of state funds in digital assets, effectively enabling Bitcoin exposure through crypto-equivalent mutual funds rather than direct currency purchases.
- • The bill restricts eligible investments to digital assets with market capitalizations exceeding $750 billion, a threshold that effectively limits investments to Bitcoin and excludes smaller, higher-risk cryptocurrencies.
- • State Treasurer Brad Briner's office signaled support for the legislation during committee testimony, indicating alignment with the bill's framework, contrasting with his predecessor Dale Folwell's more conservative investment approach.
- • House committee members expressed skepticism across both parties, requesting direct testimony from State Treasurer Briner before proceeding with a vote, delaying immediate action on the measure.
- • The bill represents a significant shift in North Carolina's investment philosophy, with supporters arguing that cryptocurrency has moved into the mainstream investment landscape over the past decade.
Summary
North Carolina is advancing legislation that would permit its state treasurer to allocate a portion of public funds into cryptocurrency investments. House Bill 92, sponsored by House Speaker Destin Hall and co-sponsored by Rep. Stephen Ross (R-Alamance), would expand the state's investment portfolio to include digital assets under specific constraints designed to mitigate risk exposure.
Under the proposed framework, State Treasurer Brad Briner could invest up to 10% of state funds into cryptocurrency through digital asset funds—structured similarly to traditional mutual funds—rather than through direct purchases of specific cryptocurrencies. The bill establishes a market capitalization floor of $750 billion for eligible digital assets, effectively limiting practical investment options to Bitcoin while technically permitting stablecoins and nonfungible tokens (NFTs) that meet the threshold. This guardrail mechanism is intended to eliminate exposure to smaller, speculative digital assets. Rep. Ross characterized the restriction during House Commerce and Economic Development Committee testimony on Tuesday, stating that it "takes away any risk involved in trying to invest in some small, off the wall cryptocurrency."
A representative from Treasurer Briner's office indicated support during the committee hearing, noting the proposal aligned with "his principles for how he wants to run the department." This marks a notable departure from the approach of Briner's predecessor, Dale Folwell, who maintained a more conservative posture toward nontraditional investments. Proponents argue the shift reflects legitimate evolution in financial markets, with Ross noting that "over the last ten years, this has gone mainstream."
Committee members from both parties expressed reservations about advancing the measure without additional scrutiny. They requested that the bill be displaced from the agenda pending direct testimony from State Treasurer Briner himself, a request that committee co-chair Rep. John Sauls (R-Lee) agreed to accommodate. The delay signals institutional caution regarding cryptocurrency exposure for public retirement and general fund assets, despite the bill's technical safeguards.
Under the proposed framework, State Treasurer Brad Briner could invest up to 10% of state funds into cryptocurrency through digital asset funds—structured similarly to traditional mutual funds—rather than through direct purchases of specific cryptocurrencies. The bill establishes a market capitalization floor of $750 billion for eligible digital assets, effectively limiting practical investment options to Bitcoin while technically permitting stablecoins and nonfungible tokens (NFTs) that meet the threshold. This guardrail mechanism is intended to eliminate exposure to smaller, speculative digital assets. Rep. Ross characterized the restriction during House Commerce and Economic Development Committee testimony on Tuesday, stating that it "takes away any risk involved in trying to invest in some small, off the wall cryptocurrency."
A representative from Treasurer Briner's office indicated support during the committee hearing, noting the proposal aligned with "his principles for how he wants to run the department." This marks a notable departure from the approach of Briner's predecessor, Dale Folwell, who maintained a more conservative posture toward nontraditional investments. Proponents argue the shift reflects legitimate evolution in financial markets, with Ross noting that "over the last ten years, this has gone mainstream."
Committee members from both parties expressed reservations about advancing the measure without additional scrutiny. They requested that the bill be displaced from the agenda pending direct testimony from State Treasurer Briner himself, a request that committee co-chair Rep. John Sauls (R-Lee) agreed to accommodate. The delay signals institutional caution regarding cryptocurrency exposure for public retirement and general fund assets, despite the bill's technical safeguards.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.