Key Takeaways
- • The SEC will keep accepting public comments on its Regulation Crypto Assets proposal after the formal Oct. 20, 2026 deadline, according to a spokesperson cited by journalist Eleanor Terrett, though no replacement deadline was set.
- • The proposal would allow eligible crypto offerings of up to $5 million over four years through a startup exemption, and up to $75 million in each 12-month period through a second exemption, both without SEC registration.
- • Both exemptions would require principles-based narrative disclosures, and the larger exemption would also require financial statements and ongoing reporting, while issuers would remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation provisions.
- • A conditional safe harbor would deem a crypto asset no longer subject to its investment contract once the issuer completes or permanently ceases its promised essential managerial efforts, and the proposal would preempt certain state registration requirements.
- • The proposal is still not effective; adoption requires a separate Commission action, and the comment deadline does not determine when it takes effect.
Summary
The Securities and Exchange Commission's formal comment window for its proposed Regulation Crypto Assets closed on Oct. 20, 2026, but the agency will continue accepting feedback, according to a spokesperson cited by journalist Eleanor Terrett. The spokesperson encouraged commenters to meet the deadline while confirming that the Commission would keep accepting public comments afterward. The statement does not establish a replacement deadline or an unlimited period for influencing the final rules, and the SEC's rulemaking page still lists Oct. 20 as the deadline. The proposal was announced on Aug. 18, published in the Federal Register on Aug. 21, and opened a 60-day consultation period under docket File No. S7-2026-27.
The proposal would establish two registration exemptions for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The first, a startup exemption, would permit eligible offerings totaling up to $5 million over four years. The second would allow offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Both would require principles-based narrative disclosures, and issuers using the larger exemption would also have to provide financial statements and meet ongoing reporting obligations, according to the SEC. Issuers would remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation provisions. The SEC argues that existing offering rules are difficult to apply to projects distributing tokens while building networks or applications, and that tailored requirements could reduce regulatory uncertainty and improve access to capital.
A separate conditional safe harbor would address when a crypto asset ceases to be subject to an investment contract after an issuer completes or permanently ceases its essential managerial efforts. If its conditions are met, the asset would be deemed no longer subject to that contract for purposes of the relevant securities definitions. The proposal would also preempt certain state securities registration and qualification requirements for exempt offerings and specified secondary-market transactions. Industry groups including the Blockchain Association have submitted comment letters supporting the framework's goals while proposing changes. The proposal remains a proposal and is not yet an available fundraising route; adoption would require a separate Commission action.
The proposal would establish two registration exemptions for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The first, a startup exemption, would permit eligible offerings totaling up to $5 million over four years. The second would allow offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Both would require principles-based narrative disclosures, and issuers using the larger exemption would also have to provide financial statements and meet ongoing reporting obligations, according to the SEC. Issuers would remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation provisions. The SEC argues that existing offering rules are difficult to apply to projects distributing tokens while building networks or applications, and that tailored requirements could reduce regulatory uncertainty and improve access to capital.
A separate conditional safe harbor would address when a crypto asset ceases to be subject to an investment contract after an issuer completes or permanently ceases its essential managerial efforts. If its conditions are met, the asset would be deemed no longer subject to that contract for purposes of the relevant securities definitions. The proposal would also preempt certain state securities registration and qualification requirements for exempt offerings and specified secondary-market transactions. Industry groups including the Blockchain Association have submitted comment letters supporting the framework's goals while proposing changes. The proposal remains a proposal and is not yet an available fundraising route; adoption would require a separate Commission action.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.