Key Takeaways
- • Bitwise General Counsel Johanna Collins-Wood endorsed the SEC's new crypto custody proposal as addressing long-standing asset manager pain points since 2017, while flagging unresolved gaps in decentralized finance treatment.
- • The proposed Rule 223-1(b)(7) permits self-custody of crypto assets where no qualified custodian exists, contingent on controls, reporting, safeguards, and mandatory transfer once a custodian becomes available.
- • The SEC framework recognizes state trust companies as qualified crypto custodians, clarifies trading authority, permits on-chain record-keeping, and establishes standing letters of authorization—practical solutions Collins-Wood characterized as addressing manager concerns.
- • DeFi vaults structured as smart contracts fall outside the custody framework's wallet and address-based architecture, leaving regulatory treatment of decentralized vault structures uncertain pending the 60-day public comment period.
- • The SEC opened a 60-day comment window following the proposal's Federal Register filing, signaling industry consultation on unresolved DeFi and broader custody issues.
Summary
The SEC's proposed crypto custody framework addresses multiple structural barriers that have constrained institutional investment in digital assets since 2017, according to Bitwise's general counsel, though critical gaps remain for decentralized finance applications. Johanna Collins-Wood characterized the proposal as "thoughtfully" resolving problems asset managers have confronted in accessing new tokens when no qualified custodian would accept them—a recurring friction point in the institutional adoption of crypto. The framework introduces Rule 223-1(b)(7), which permits investment advisers and funds to hold crypto assets directly under specified conditions, including controls, reporting requirements, and other safeguards, with the mandate to transfer assets to a qualified custodian once one becomes available.
The proposal expands custodial options by formally recognizing state trust companies as qualified crypto custodians, clarifying trading authority structures, and permitting record-keeping on-chain. Collins-Wood identified these provisions as pragmatic advances addressing real operational constraints faced by asset managers. The framework also establishes clarity around standing letters of authorization, reducing compliance ambiguity in crypto holdings.
However, Collins-Wood identified a material limitation: the proposal's architecture rests on an assumption—that crypto custody can be organized around discrete wallets and client addresses—that does not reflect how decentralized finance operates. Vaults running on smart contracts fall outside the rule's scope, leaving the regulatory treatment of DeFi vault structures in substantive limbo. This gap is particularly significant given the scale of decentralized finance protocols. The SEC has opened a 60-day comment period following the proposal's Federal Register filing, indicating an opportunity for industry input on DeFi structures and other unresolved custody questions before final rulemaking.
The proposal expands custodial options by formally recognizing state trust companies as qualified crypto custodians, clarifying trading authority structures, and permitting record-keeping on-chain. Collins-Wood identified these provisions as pragmatic advances addressing real operational constraints faced by asset managers. The framework also establishes clarity around standing letters of authorization, reducing compliance ambiguity in crypto holdings.
However, Collins-Wood identified a material limitation: the proposal's architecture rests on an assumption—that crypto custody can be organized around discrete wallets and client addresses—that does not reflect how decentralized finance operates. Vaults running on smart contracts fall outside the rule's scope, leaving the regulatory treatment of DeFi vault structures in substantive limbo. This gap is particularly significant given the scale of decentralized finance protocols. The SEC has opened a 60-day comment period following the proposal's Federal Register filing, indicating an opportunity for industry input on DeFi structures and other unresolved custody questions before final rulemaking.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.