Key Takeaways
- • One in four European wealth managers (25%) report a "management gap" exceeding 50%, meaning the majority of their clients' digital asset holdings remain invisible and unmonitored within the advisory relationship, according to a CoinShares survey of 261 advisers across five markets (France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom).
- • The United Kingdom shows the most acute visibility problem, with 52% of advisers unable to see more than half of their clients' crypto exposure, suggesting significant structural gaps in portfolio oversight and fiduciary accountability.
- • The management gap correlates directly with adviser engagement level: advisers who actively recommend digital assets report a management gap above 50% in approximately 10% of cases, compared to 40% among advisers who feel insufficiently informed to advise—a fourfold differential.
- • The visibility gap reflects firm policy constraints rather than client demand or adviser knowledge deficits, indicating that institutional barriers and compliance frameworks, not market demand, determine whether digital assets are integrated into wealth management practices.
- • Digital asset exposure already exists within client portfolios today, framing this as an immediate governance and fiduciary risk rather than a future adoption question.
Summary
A CoinShares survey released June 25, 2026, reveals a structural governance crisis within European wealth management: approximately one in four advisers across five major markets cannot monitor the majority of their clients' digital asset holdings. The survey, which reached 261 wealth management professionals across France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, identifies what researchers term a "management gap"—the proportion of client crypto exposure that sits entirely outside adviser oversight.
The severity of this visibility problem varies significantly by geography. While the aggregate figure of 25% of advisers reporting a management gap above 50% represents a meaningful portion of the industry, the United Kingdom presents a particularly acute case, with 52% of advisers unable to see more than half of what their clients hold in digital assets. This disparity suggests uneven regulatory interpretation or institutional policy divergence across the surveyed markets.
The research identifies a clear behavioral pattern: the management gap scales inversely with adviser engagement. Advisers who actively recommend digital assets report a management gap exceeding 50% in fewer than 10% of cases, indicating that proactive digital asset integration substantially improves visibility. Conversely, advisers who report feeling insufficiently informed to provide guidance experience management gaps above 50% in approximately 40% of cases—more than four times the rate among engaged advisers. This correlation holds consistently across all five markets and all five adviser postures examined.
Critically, CoinShares attributes this visibility problem to firm policy constraints rather than to knowledge gaps or insufficient client demand. The framing carries significant implications for fiduciary accountability: clients are already invested in digital assets today, and large portions of these holdings remain unmonitored not because advisers lack capability or clients lack interest, but because institutional policies restrict integration. This structural barrier creates a governance vacuum in which clients maintain substantial asset exposure—potentially representing material portfolio percentages—entirely outside the purview of their paid advisers, raising questions about disclosure adequacy and portfolio completeness within wealth management relationships.
The severity of this visibility problem varies significantly by geography. While the aggregate figure of 25% of advisers reporting a management gap above 50% represents a meaningful portion of the industry, the United Kingdom presents a particularly acute case, with 52% of advisers unable to see more than half of what their clients hold in digital assets. This disparity suggests uneven regulatory interpretation or institutional policy divergence across the surveyed markets.
The research identifies a clear behavioral pattern: the management gap scales inversely with adviser engagement. Advisers who actively recommend digital assets report a management gap exceeding 50% in fewer than 10% of cases, indicating that proactive digital asset integration substantially improves visibility. Conversely, advisers who report feeling insufficiently informed to provide guidance experience management gaps above 50% in approximately 40% of cases—more than four times the rate among engaged advisers. This correlation holds consistently across all five markets and all five adviser postures examined.
Critically, CoinShares attributes this visibility problem to firm policy constraints rather than to knowledge gaps or insufficient client demand. The framing carries significant implications for fiduciary accountability: clients are already invested in digital assets today, and large portions of these holdings remain unmonitored not because advisers lack capability or clients lack interest, but because institutional policies restrict integration. This structural barrier creates a governance vacuum in which clients maintain substantial asset exposure—potentially representing material portfolio percentages—entirely outside the purview of their paid advisers, raising questions about disclosure adequacy and portfolio completeness within wealth management relationships.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.