Key Takeaways
- • AC Tiger Value Fund has delivered annualized returns exceeding 11% with volatility below 7% over its eight-year track record, substantially outperforming long-only equity indices while maintaining low gross exposure (84% as of June 2017) and moderate net long exposure (35%).
- • The fund's alpha generation strategy focuses on European small and mid-cap equities, a market segment characterized by significant inefficiency due to limited sell-side analyst coverage and minimal buy-side institutional following, creating a structural advantage for active managers.
- • Tiger Asset Management operates a disciplined, non-leveraged long/short strategy with net exposure fluctuating between 20% and 60%, rejecting beta-centric approaches and emphasizing that historical beta proves an unreliable predictor of future volatility.
- • The fund's performance demonstrates that substantial alpha can be generated through security selection in underserved market segments without requiring high gross exposure or elevated leverage, with the strategy's beta-adjusted net exposure typically running lower than raw positioning metrics.
- • European equities attracted significant net inflows in 2017 after years of underperformance, with small and mid-cap stocks showing particular resilience as the fund has outpaced broad, large-cap-dominated benchmarks since 2009.
Summary
Tiger Asset Management, the fund's investment advisor, operates with deliberately constrained positioning metrics. As of June 2017, the fund maintained gross exposure of 84% and net long exposure of 35%, demonstrating that meaningful alpha generation does not require full market beta exposure. The strategy's net exposure has fluctuated within a 20% to 60% range over its eight-year history, yet consistently outpaced a fully invested equity index benchmark—a performance characteristic indicating substantial true alpha rather than market-driven returns.
The fundamental driver of the fund's advantage is market inefficiency. European equities, particularly small and mid-cap securities, suffer from minimal sell-side analyst coverage and limited institutional buy-side interest. This structural void creates opportunities for disciplined fundamental managers to identify mispriced securities without competing against crowded consensus. European equities began attracting meaningful net inflows in 2017 after extended underperformance, creating a favorable backdrop for strategies emphasizing active security selection in overlooked segments.
Peter Irblad, Head of Research at Tiger Asset Management, emphasized the fund's rejection of conventional beta frameworks, noting that "historical beta is not a good guide to the future" and that volatility dynamics shift materially as securities become overvalued. This philosophy informs the fund's non-publication of beta-adjusted net exposure metrics; instead, the firm relies on internally calculated beta-adjusted positioning, which typically runs lower than raw exposure figures. The strategy's approach reflects a conviction that true risk management requires dynamic, forward-looking volatility assessment rather than retrospective statistical measures, positioning the fund to navigate changing market regimes more effectively than passive beta strategies.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.