Key Takeaways
- • Delaware's Supreme Court ruled for activist hedge fund ATG Capital Opportunities LP on Thursday, upholding an August Delaware Chancery Court decision and clearing the way for a proxy contest at Empery Digital Inc.
- • The Supreme Court issued its decision in a single page, one day after hearing the appeal.
- • A shareholder vote scheduled for Oct. 14, 2026 will pit the sitting board, led by CEO Ryan Lane, against ATG's nominees.
- • Empery Digital is a "digital asset treasury" whose business is buying and holding Bitcoin, making the board fight a test case for governance at crypto treasury companies.
Summary
Delaware's top court ruled Thursday in favor of ATG Capital Opportunities LP, upholding an August decision by a Delaware Chancery Court judge, according to Bloomberg Law. The ruling means the CEO and board of Empery Digital Inc. lost their effort to avoid a proxy fight with the activist hedge fund seeking their board seats. Empery describes itself as a "digital asset treasury" devoted to buying and holding Bitcoin.
The Delaware Supreme Court issued its decision in a single page, one day after hearing arguments in the appeal. Earlier, the Chancery Court had refused to let Empery immediately appeal the ruling that required it to put the activist's proposals before shareholders. Sitting directors led by CEO Ryan Lane had argued against the proxy contest.
The high court's ruling sets an Oct. 14 shareholder vote in which the sitting board will face ATG's challenge for board seats. Coverage of the case notes that activist ATG Capital Opportunities Fund was granted access to the shareholder ballot, a development that other outlets described as allowing it to challenge the board directly.
Proxy contests of this kind are typically difficult for activists. Academic analysis of proxy contests, including work by John C. Coffee Jr., has found that activists have generally won only a small number of seats in a clear minority of cases. The outcome of the Empery vote will therefore be closely watched as a test of shareholder leverage at digital asset treasury companies.
The Delaware Supreme Court issued its decision in a single page, one day after hearing arguments in the appeal. Earlier, the Chancery Court had refused to let Empery immediately appeal the ruling that required it to put the activist's proposals before shareholders. Sitting directors led by CEO Ryan Lane had argued against the proxy contest.
The high court's ruling sets an Oct. 14 shareholder vote in which the sitting board will face ATG's challenge for board seats. Coverage of the case notes that activist ATG Capital Opportunities Fund was granted access to the shareholder ballot, a development that other outlets described as allowing it to challenge the board directly.
Proxy contests of this kind are typically difficult for activists. Academic analysis of proxy contests, including work by John C. Coffee Jr., has found that activists have generally won only a small number of seats in a clear minority of cases. The outcome of the Empery vote will therefore be closely watched as a test of shareholder leverage at digital asset treasury companies.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.