Key Takeaways
- • The story's only available evidence is an opinion column by Ion Zulueta, director of analysis at iCapital, published on Funds Society, arguing that hedge funds deserve renewed attention from Spanish investors.
- • Zulueta contends that hedge funds offer the potential for decorrelation from traditional assets, not merely illiquidity, which he sees as the main appeal of private markets.
- • The column cautions that not all hedge fund strategies diversify a 60/40 portfolio, citing long/short equity, credit L/S and macro funds as examples with meaningful market exposure.
- • Zulueta argues that the absence of daily mark-to-market in private markets does not eliminate economic risk, and that manager selection beyond historical returns is becoming more important.
Summary
An opinion piece published on Funds Society under the Spanish-language headline "Hedge Funds en España: ¿Vuelven a ser relevantes?" argues that hedge funds may be regaining relevance among Spanish investors after years of declining interest. The author, Ion Zulueta, director of analysis at iCapital, notes that since 2008 many investors have moved away from hedge funds due to fees, complexity, limited liquidity, perceived operational risk and, in some cases, disappointing results, with private markets becoming the dominant allocation theme.
Zulueta argues that conditions may be shifting. With equity markets at historically high levels and bonds not always performing their traditional safe-haven role in recent episodes, he contends that investors are again looking for return sources that differ from a traditional stock and bond portfolio. He frames the key distinction as decorrelation rather than illiquidity, which he sees as the area where hedge funds can offer something private markets often cannot.
The column also qualifies the case. Zulueta notes that many hedge fund strategies do not diversify a 60/40 portfolio: long/short equity can retain considerable equity exposure, credit long/short funds depend heavily on the credit cycle, and macro funds can take risks that behave like traditional assets at times. He points instead to market neutral, relative value, systematic macro and statistical arbitrage strategies as potentially having return sources substantially different from long equity, duration or credit risk.
Zulueta also challenges what he describes as a conceptual error in recent diversification discussions, namely confusing the absence of daily pricing with the absence of risk. He argues that private equity holdings, while not marked to market daily, retain economic risk. He concludes that growing interest in offshore hedge funds, directly or through Spanish vehicles, would make manager evaluation beyond past performance increasingly important, requiring experience, judgment and analytical resources. In his words, hedge funds do not need to become mainstream again, but they need to be understood again.
The piece is an opinion column rather than reported news; no new fund launches, flows or deal figures are cited in the available material.
Zulueta argues that conditions may be shifting. With equity markets at historically high levels and bonds not always performing their traditional safe-haven role in recent episodes, he contends that investors are again looking for return sources that differ from a traditional stock and bond portfolio. He frames the key distinction as decorrelation rather than illiquidity, which he sees as the area where hedge funds can offer something private markets often cannot.
The column also qualifies the case. Zulueta notes that many hedge fund strategies do not diversify a 60/40 portfolio: long/short equity can retain considerable equity exposure, credit long/short funds depend heavily on the credit cycle, and macro funds can take risks that behave like traditional assets at times. He points instead to market neutral, relative value, systematic macro and statistical arbitrage strategies as potentially having return sources substantially different from long equity, duration or credit risk.
Zulueta also challenges what he describes as a conceptual error in recent diversification discussions, namely confusing the absence of daily pricing with the absence of risk. He argues that private equity holdings, while not marked to market daily, retain economic risk. He concludes that growing interest in offshore hedge funds, directly or through Spanish vehicles, would make manager evaluation beyond past performance increasingly important, requiring experience, judgment and analytical resources. In his words, hedge funds do not need to become mainstream again, but they need to be understood again.
The piece is an opinion column rather than reported news; no new fund launches, flows or deal figures are cited in the available material.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.