Key Takeaways
- • Citadel's Global Fixed Income fund tumbled 4.75% during the week of March 3-7, 2026, leaving the fund down 2% year-to-date, according to Bloomberg reporting on March 11, 2026.
- • Taula Capital Management, the $7.6 billion macro fund managed by Diego Megia, declined approximately 4.7% during the same volatile trading week, placing it among the worst-performing hedge funds.
- • D.E. Shaw & Co.'s two main vehicles emerged as a rare bright spot during the market turmoil, contrasting sharply with losses sustained by larger multi-strategy and fixed income competitors.
- • Both Citadel GFI and Taula Capital experienced near-identical drawdowns of approximately 4.7-4.75%, suggesting broad-based market stress affecting fixed income and macro strategies simultaneously.
Summary
Citadel's Global Fixed Income fund and Diego Megia's Taula Capital Management were among the hardest-hit hedge funds during a volatile trading week in early March 2026, according to Bloomberg reporting on March 11. The losses underscore the sector-wide challenges facing fixed income and macro-focused strategies as market conditions deteriorated.
Citadel's GFI fund, positioned as a smaller, specialized vehicle relative to the firm's flagship Wellington fund, declined 4.75% during the week, bringing year-to-date performance to a loss of 2%. The scale of the single-week drawdown reflects the acute sensitivity of dedicated fixed income portfolios to volatility in global bond markets during periods of market stress.
Taula Capital Management's macro fund, which manages $7.6 billion in assets, experienced a nearly identical loss of approximately 4.7% during the same period. The convergence of losses across different strategy types—both fixed income and macro—suggests that broad market dislocation, rather than strategy-specific factors, drove the declines.
In stark contrast to these losses, D.E. Shaw & Co.'s two principal hedge fund vehicles posted gains during the turbulent week, establishing themselves as a notable exception in an otherwise difficult environment for the industry. This divergence highlights the varying resilience of different portfolio construction approaches and risk management frameworks during periods of elevated volatility.
The trading week reflects ongoing challenges for established hedge fund managers navigating volatile market conditions in 2026, with performance disparities widening between firms with differentiated positioning and those concentrated in traditional fixed income or macro exposures.
Citadel's GFI fund, positioned as a smaller, specialized vehicle relative to the firm's flagship Wellington fund, declined 4.75% during the week, bringing year-to-date performance to a loss of 2%. The scale of the single-week drawdown reflects the acute sensitivity of dedicated fixed income portfolios to volatility in global bond markets during periods of market stress.
Taula Capital Management's macro fund, which manages $7.6 billion in assets, experienced a nearly identical loss of approximately 4.7% during the same period. The convergence of losses across different strategy types—both fixed income and macro—suggests that broad market dislocation, rather than strategy-specific factors, drove the declines.
In stark contrast to these losses, D.E. Shaw & Co.'s two principal hedge fund vehicles posted gains during the turbulent week, establishing themselves as a notable exception in an otherwise difficult environment for the industry. This divergence highlights the varying resilience of different portfolio construction approaches and risk management frameworks during periods of elevated volatility.
The trading week reflects ongoing challenges for established hedge fund managers navigating volatile market conditions in 2026, with performance disparities widening between firms with differentiated positioning and those concentrated in traditional fixed income or macro exposures.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.