Key Takeaways
- • Singapore High Court ruled cryptocurrency is not "money" under Singapore law, rejecting the Algorand Foundation's application to liquidate Three Arrows Capital based on a $53.5 million USDC claim, creating uncertainty for creditors seeking to initiate insolvency proceedings denominated in digital assets.
- • Three Arrows Capital, once managing ~$10 billion in assets, collapsed following the May 2022 TerraUSD and Luna collapse, with the firm defaulting on major obligations including 15,250 bitcoin (~$324 million) owed to Voyager Digital and $350 million in USDC.
- • Regulatory enforcement preceded insolvency: Singapore's Monetary Authority reprimanded Three Arrows in June 2022 for providing false information and exceeding assets under management thresholds for registered fund managers during 2020–2021, with MAS questioning the fund's solvency.
- • The decision creates a critical legal distinction: while Singapore courts recognize cryptocurrency as property capable of legal protection, the rejection of crypto as "money" limits creditors' ability to use statutory demand procedures and insolvency mechanisms traditionally available for debt denominated in recognized currencies.
- • BVI court ordered Three Arrows into liquidation after the Singapore ruling, establishing parallel insolvency proceedings in different jurisdictions and highlighting fragmented regulatory treatment of cryptocurrency debt across global financial centers.
Summary
The Singapore High Court's rejection of cryptocurrency as "money" under Singapore law marks a significant—and restrictive—legal precedent for digital asset creditors. In April 2023, the court denied the Algorand Foundation's application to liquidate Three Arrows Capital based on the fund's alleged $53.5 million USDC debt. The ruling clarifies that while Singapore law recognizes cryptocurrency as a form of property capable of legal ownership and protection, digital assets do not qualify as "money" for purposes of statutory insolvency proceedings. This distinction creates practical barriers for creditors seeking to initiate liquidation based on cryptocurrency claims, as traditional debt enforcement mechanisms tied to recognized currency denominations are unavailable.
Three Arrows Capital, a Singapore-based cryptocurrency hedge fund established in 2012 by Zhu Su and Kyle Davies, exemplifies the cascading failures within the digital asset ecosystem. The firm once managed approximately $10 billion in assets under management but faced severe losses following the May 2022 collapse of TerraUSD and its sister token Luna. In June 2022, Singapore's Monetary Authority reprimanded Three Arrows for regulatory violations, including providing false information to MAS and exceeding the assets under management threshold permitted for registered fund managers during 2020 and 2021. MAS simultaneously questioned the fund's solvency given market developments.
The firm's inability to meet debt obligations became acute when Voyager Digital, a cryptocurrency broker, issued a default notice in June 2022 after Three Arrows failed to repay a loan of 15,250 bitcoin (valued at approximately $324 million at the time) and $350 million in USDC. These defaults triggered broader insolvency action; a British Virgin Islands court subsequently ordered Three Arrows into liquidation. The parallel proceedings in Singapore and the BVI underscore the fragmented treatment of cryptocurrency debt across jurisdictions, leaving creditors navigating conflicting legal frameworks regarding the enforceability of digital asset claims.
The High Court's distinction between cryptocurrency as property and cryptocurrency as money carries material implications for institutional investors and alternative investment professionals holding positions in cryptocurrency-exposed counterparties. While the recognition of crypto as property provides some legal recourse against wrongful interference with digital holdings, the exclusion of crypto from "money" status undermines traditional creditor remedies. This creates asymmetric risk for hedge funds, family offices, and other sophisticated investors holding cryptocurrency-denominated claims, as insolvency procedures designed for fiat currency debts may not apply to digital asset exposures in Singapore—a major financial center with significant cryptocurrency activity.
Three Arrows Capital, a Singapore-based cryptocurrency hedge fund established in 2012 by Zhu Su and Kyle Davies, exemplifies the cascading failures within the digital asset ecosystem. The firm once managed approximately $10 billion in assets under management but faced severe losses following the May 2022 collapse of TerraUSD and its sister token Luna. In June 2022, Singapore's Monetary Authority reprimanded Three Arrows for regulatory violations, including providing false information to MAS and exceeding the assets under management threshold permitted for registered fund managers during 2020 and 2021. MAS simultaneously questioned the fund's solvency given market developments.
The firm's inability to meet debt obligations became acute when Voyager Digital, a cryptocurrency broker, issued a default notice in June 2022 after Three Arrows failed to repay a loan of 15,250 bitcoin (valued at approximately $324 million at the time) and $350 million in USDC. These defaults triggered broader insolvency action; a British Virgin Islands court subsequently ordered Three Arrows into liquidation. The parallel proceedings in Singapore and the BVI underscore the fragmented treatment of cryptocurrency debt across jurisdictions, leaving creditors navigating conflicting legal frameworks regarding the enforceability of digital asset claims.
The High Court's distinction between cryptocurrency as property and cryptocurrency as money carries material implications for institutional investors and alternative investment professionals holding positions in cryptocurrency-exposed counterparties. While the recognition of crypto as property provides some legal recourse against wrongful interference with digital holdings, the exclusion of crypto from "money" status undermines traditional creditor remedies. This creates asymmetric risk for hedge funds, family offices, and other sophisticated investors holding cryptocurrency-denominated claims, as insolvency procedures designed for fiat currency debts may not apply to digital asset exposures in Singapore—a major financial center with significant cryptocurrency activity.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.