AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Esma backtracks on account segregation

Reported by Risk
Aug 9, 2017· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • ESMA abandons stricter account segregation rules under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), reversing course on regulatory proposals that critics warned would constrain tri-party repo, securities lending, and prime brokerage markets.
  • • Rehypothecation of collateral remains permitted under the status quo framework, allowing financial institutions to reuse client assets in tri-party arrangements and prime brokerage services without enhanced segregation protections.
  • • Minimum EU-wide segregation standards adopted rather than strict depository requirements, preserving operational flexibility for market participants while maintaining baseline protections across member states.
  • • Market structure concerns validated: The reversal confirms predictions from industry analysts that overly stringent rules would disrupt critical funding markets and intermediation services relied upon by alternative investment funds and institutional investors.
Summary
The European Securities and Markets Authority has reversed its position on account segregation requirements for depositories under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, opting instead for minimum EU-wide standards rather than stricter rules that market participants had warned would constrain core funding markets.

The regulatory backtrack preserves the ability of financial institutions to engage in rehypothecation of collateral within tri-party repo arrangements, securities lending operations, and prime brokerage services. This decision maintains the existing operational framework that allows depositary institutions to reuse client assets, a practice that critics of stricter rules had flagged as essential to market functioning.

Industry observers had previously cautioned that tighter account segregation requirements would effectively choke the tri-party repo and prime brokerage markets by imposing operational and capital constraints that would reduce market liquidity and increase intermediation costs. The ESMA's decision to adopt minimum rather than maximum segregation requirements reflects a pragmatic recognition of these market structure concerns, prioritizing market functioning over enhanced asset protection.

The outcome represents a significant shift from what had been anticipated by regulatory observers tracking the AIFMD implementation. By establishing minimum rather than strict EU-wide standards, ESMA has balanced regulatory objectives with the practical needs of alternative investment fund managers, prime brokers, and securities lending market participants who depend on efficient collateral management practices.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Risk Esma backtracks on account segregation