AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Goldman Sachs says top hedge fund jobs are more difficult, more lucrative, harder to come by

Reported by Efinancialcareers
Oct 24, 2025· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Goldman Sachs' prime brokerage analytics team reports that multistrategy hedge fund headcount has expanded 371% from 5,100 employees in 2017 to 24,000 in 2025, but growth rates have decelerated to the slowest pace in eight years.
  • • Investment professional positions as a share of total hedge fund employment have contracted sharply from 67% to 45%, indicating a structural shift toward support and technology staff rather than portfolio managers.
  • • Top portfolio manager compensation remains exceptional, with individual managers now overseeing approximately $2 billion in gross market value and expected to generate $100 million+ in annual profits, according to Balyasny Asset Management founder Dmitry Balyasny.
  • • Hedge funds increasingly rely on quants and technologists rather than traditional portfolio management staff, exemplified by firms like Qube Research & Technologies that prioritize coding strategies over portfolio management headcount.
  • • The tightening supply of elite portfolio manager roles creates a bifurcated employment market: highly lucrative senior positions become scarcer while lower-tier support roles proliferate.
Summary
Goldman Sachs' prime brokerage analytics team, led by Freddie Parker and Vincent Lin, released a report this month documenting significant structural shifts in hedge fund labor markets. The analysis reveals a paradox defining the sector's current trajectory: while multistrategy hedge funds have dramatically expanded overall headcount, the pace of growth is decelerating and the composition of that workforce is shifting decisively away from investment professionals.

The headcount expansion over the past eight years has been substantial. Multistrategy hedge funds employed only 5,100 people in 2017 and now employ 24,000, representing 371% growth. However, Goldman Sachs notes this growth rate represents the slowest expansion since the firm began tracking the data eight years ago, signaling a maturing labor cycle in the sector. Simultaneously, the proportion of employees engaged in actual money management has contracted significantly. Investment professionals now represent 45% of total hedge fund employment, down from 67% in 2017—a 22-percentage-point decline that underscores the industry's shift toward infrastructure and technology.

This structural realignment reflects evolving fund operating models. Firms like Qube Research & Technologies minimize traditional portfolio management staff entirely, instead relying heavily on quantitative researchers and technologists to develop and execute trading strategies. Similarly, recent UK regulatory filings from multistrategy operator Schonfeld demonstrate workforce divisions concentrated across specialized technical teams rather than traditional portfolio management hierarchies.

For top-tier portfolio managers, compensation dynamics remain exceptionally favorable despite the narrowing pipeline. Dmitry Balyasny, founder of Balyasny Asset Management, noted on Bloomberg's Masters in Business podcast that portfolio managers now typically oversee approximately $2 billion in gross market value and are expected to generate $100 million or more in annual profits. This concentration of capital and responsibility at senior levels, combined with reduced hiring of investment professionals, creates a bifurcated labor market: elite portfolio manager roles become increasingly scarce and lucrative, while support positions proliferate as hedge funds expand their operational and technology infrastructure.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Efinancialcareers Goldman Sachs says top hedge fund jobs are more difficult, more lucrative, harder to come by