Key Takeaways
- • D.E. Shaw, one of the world's largest hedge funds with approximately $60 billion in assets under management, has accumulated a $1 billion stake in Air Products and Chemicals (market cap: $71 billion) and nominated three directors to the board, citing private engagement efforts that were "largely rebuffed" and marked by "an apparent lack of urgency."
- • Scott Sutton, former CEO of Olin Corporation, is among D.E. Shaw's three director nominees and is considered a potential CEO candidate, signaling activist pressure for leadership succession planning at the 80-year-old incumbent CEO Seifi Ghasemi.
- • D.E. Shaw's campaign joins Mantle Ridge (Paul Hilal's fund) in a two-pronged activist challenge, with D.E. Shaw seeking three board seats while Mantle Ridge pursues a full proxy fight for board control—both funds hold similarly sized stakes and share a focus on CEO succession planning.
- • The hedge fund specifically targets Air Products' capital allocation strategy on multi-billion-dollar hydrogen projects lacking offtake agreements (guaranteed cash flow commitments), contrasting the company's approach with lower-risk industry peers like Linde that secure such agreements before deployment.
- • D.E. Shaw attributes Air Products' underperformance versus historical averages and peer companies partly to this departure from industry-standard risk management in major infrastructure investments.
Summary
The activist campaign arrives alongside a parallel effort by Mantle Ridge, the hedge fund controlled by Paul Hilal, which holds a similarly sized stake. However, the two funds are pursuing distinct strategies: D.E. Shaw is seeking three board seats, while Mantle Ridge intends to mount a comprehensive proxy fight for control of the entire board. Both activists are focused on establishing a clear succession plan for CEO Seifi Ghasemi, who is 80 years old. Scott Sutton, the former CEO of Olin Corporation, is identified as one of D.E. Shaw's director nominees and is positioned as a potential internal or external CEO candidate.
The substantive operational critique centers on Air Products' capital allocation framework for major infrastructure projects. D.E. Shaw contends that the company has initiated significant hydrogen initiatives costing billions of dollars without securing offtake agreements—long-term contracts that guarantee minimum cash flows from these investments. This represents a departure from historical Air Products practice and industry norms, as demonstrated by competitors like Linde, which typically structure comparable projects with such downside protection. D.E. Shaw argues this structural risk is a material driver of the company's stock underperformance relative to both its historical trading averages and peer-group benchmarks. CEO Ghasemi has publicly defended the capital-light strategy despite activist pressure and competitive evidence favoring more conservative deal structuring.
The dual activist engagement at Air Products represents a significant challenge to incumbent management on both governance and strategic grounds, with both D.E. Shaw and Mantle Ridge seeking to enforce material changes in board composition, succession planning, and capital allocation discipline before the next shareholder meeting.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.