Key Takeaways
- • Nearly half of U.S.-based hedge fund launches in 2024 began as separately managed accounts (SMAs) for single investors, a structural shift driven by capital scarcity and institutional consolidation, according to Goldman Sachs data cited in the primary source.
- • Large multistrategy hedge funds have solidified their position as industry gatekeepers, forcing emerging fund managers to accept single-client arrangements rather than launching traditional co-mingled funds to access capital.
- • The separately managed account model has gained sustained traction since the 2008 financial crisis, with increasing adoption among hedge fund founders as an alternative to the traditional multi-investor fund structure.
- • Emerging managers are increasingly negotiating arrangements with multistrategy platforms, accepting operational constraints in exchange for capital access and potential pathways to larger capital bases.
Summary
The hedge fund industry is experiencing a structural realignment in how emerging managers access capital, with separately managed accounts (SMAs) serving single investors now representing the dominant entry point for new fund launches. According to a Goldman Sachs report cited in Bloomberg's reporting, nearly 50% of U.S.-based hedge fund launches in 2024 utilized the SMA model rather than the traditional co-mingled fund structure. This represents a significant acceleration of a trend that gained initial momentum following the 2008 financial crisis.
The shift reflects a fundamental power imbalance in capital allocation. Large multistrategy hedge funds—platforms such as Schonfeld Strategic Advisors and other major players—have effectively become gatekeepers for emerging talent and capital deployment. Rather than launching independent funds with diversified investor bases, hedge fund founders increasingly accept arrangements to manage money for single institutional investors through SMAs. This structural choice, while restrictive in the short term, provides emerging managers with necessary capital and operational legitimacy.
Institutional investors have driven this dynamic by demanding separately managed account arrangements rather than co-mingled fund investments, a requirement that major multistrategy platforms have leveraged as both a control mechanism and a service offering. For emerging managers, accepting these terms has become a pragmatic necessity—accessing capital from major institutions often requires compliance with SMA structures, even though such arrangements limit fund independence and scalability.
The prevalence of SMAs among new launches underscores the consolidation of capital within the hedge fund industry and the reduced viability of independent fund launches for emerging managers. This trend has implications for capital formation, competitive dynamics, and the traditional pathway to hedge fund management, with emerging managers increasingly dependent on relationships with established multistrategy platforms for access to institutional capital and operational resources.
The shift reflects a fundamental power imbalance in capital allocation. Large multistrategy hedge funds—platforms such as Schonfeld Strategic Advisors and other major players—have effectively become gatekeepers for emerging talent and capital deployment. Rather than launching independent funds with diversified investor bases, hedge fund founders increasingly accept arrangements to manage money for single institutional investors through SMAs. This structural choice, while restrictive in the short term, provides emerging managers with necessary capital and operational legitimacy.
Institutional investors have driven this dynamic by demanding separately managed account arrangements rather than co-mingled fund investments, a requirement that major multistrategy platforms have leveraged as both a control mechanism and a service offering. For emerging managers, accepting these terms has become a pragmatic necessity—accessing capital from major institutions often requires compliance with SMA structures, even though such arrangements limit fund independence and scalability.
The prevalence of SMAs among new launches underscores the consolidation of capital within the hedge fund industry and the reduced viability of independent fund launches for emerging managers. This trend has implications for capital formation, competitive dynamics, and the traditional pathway to hedge fund management, with emerging managers increasingly dependent on relationships with established multistrategy platforms for access to institutional capital and operational resources.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.