Key Takeaways
- • Andrew Pardo, a former intern at Point72, filed a $20 million lawsuit against the hedge fund alleging failure to accommodate his PTSD after being assigned to a desk adjacent to a high-traffic walking route.
- • Pardo voluntarily departed a return offer from Bank of America's investment banking division to accept the Point72 internship, subsequently claiming the working environment triggered pre-existing mental health conditions and rendered him unable to complete assigned tasks.
- • The complaint alleges Point72 removed Pardo from the program after he declined participation in a group trip to Chicago and failed to complete his first assignment, with the intern reporting he was dismissed following an emotional episode.
- • The lawsuit contains broader allegations against Point72's recruitment practices, including claims that the firm's campus hiring at the University of Michigan favors applicants from an exclusive student investment society screened for "cultural fit," though Pardo himself was not a member of this organization.
- • The case raises questions about workplace accommodation obligations for mental health conditions in competitive finance environments and the treatment of interns within hedge fund operational structures.
Summary
Andrew Pardo, formerly an intern at hedge fund Point72, has initiated a $20 million lawsuit claiming the firm failed to reasonably accommodate his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), ultimately leading to his removal from the internship program. According to the complaint, Pardo's mental health condition—which he believed he had previously managed—was exacerbated when he was assigned to a desk positioned next to a high-traffic walking route between common office areas and facilities. The placement reportedly triggered his symptoms, preventing him from completing his initial internship assignment.
The trajectory of Pardo's tenure at Point72 deteriorated after the desk assignment. He declined to participate in an organized group trip to Chicago and subsequently failed to complete his first project assignment. When he was terminated from the internship program, Pardo became visibly emotional, and according to his account, was told by a supervisor: "We can't send you to a portfolio manager…like this." This statement forms part of Pardo's claim that Point72 handled his mental health crisis unsympathetically and without appropriate accommodation.
The significance of this decision is underscored by Pardo's prior professional standing. He had received and accepted a return offer to join Bank of America's investment banking division before choosing instead to pursue the Point72 internship—an opportunity he now claims was terminated due to the firm's alleged negligence in managing workplace accommodations. By pursuing the $20 million claim, Pardo is seeking damages for what he characterizes as wrongful termination and failure to provide reasonable workplace modifications.
The complaint also raises ancillary allegations regarding Point72's broader recruitment practices. Pardo contends that the firm's campus recruitment at the University of Michigan operates on an exclusionary basis, drawing candidates exclusively from a selective student investment society that screens for "cultural fit." However, Pardo notes that he himself gained entry to the internship program without membership in this organization, which complicates the coherence of this particular grievance. The complaint's inclusion of these recruitment-related claims suggests Pardo's legal team may be attempting to establish a pattern of exclusionary behavior at the firm, though the direct relevance to the core accommodation dispute remains unclear.
The trajectory of Pardo's tenure at Point72 deteriorated after the desk assignment. He declined to participate in an organized group trip to Chicago and subsequently failed to complete his first project assignment. When he was terminated from the internship program, Pardo became visibly emotional, and according to his account, was told by a supervisor: "We can't send you to a portfolio manager…like this." This statement forms part of Pardo's claim that Point72 handled his mental health crisis unsympathetically and without appropriate accommodation.
The significance of this decision is underscored by Pardo's prior professional standing. He had received and accepted a return offer to join Bank of America's investment banking division before choosing instead to pursue the Point72 internship—an opportunity he now claims was terminated due to the firm's alleged negligence in managing workplace accommodations. By pursuing the $20 million claim, Pardo is seeking damages for what he characterizes as wrongful termination and failure to provide reasonable workplace modifications.
The complaint also raises ancillary allegations regarding Point72's broader recruitment practices. Pardo contends that the firm's campus recruitment at the University of Michigan operates on an exclusionary basis, drawing candidates exclusively from a selective student investment society that screens for "cultural fit." However, Pardo notes that he himself gained entry to the internship program without membership in this organization, which complicates the coherence of this particular grievance. The complaint's inclusion of these recruitment-related claims suggests Pardo's legal team may be attempting to establish a pattern of exclusionary behavior at the firm, though the direct relevance to the core accommodation dispute remains unclear.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.