Key Takeaways
- • The UK Supreme Court unanimously dismissed BlueCrest Capital Management's appeal in a case worth £200m, ruling that most of the fund's 80 to 100 disputed partners should be treated as employees for tax purposes, with only four qualifying as genuine partners.
- • HMRC has resumed investigations into several City firms, and advisers report a sharp increase in inquiries into the tax status of partners at hedge funds, consultancies and law firms structured as limited liability partnerships.
- • Businesses found to have misclassified partners could face up to six years of backdated National Insurance contributions, according to the Financial Times.
- • Firms are reviewing voting rights, management responsibilities and capital commitments, and some are negotiating settlements rather than litigating.
- • The ruling is expected to tighten partner promotion criteria and may raise employment costs for UK-based managers.
Summary
UK hedge funds are reviewing their partnership structures and negotiating with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) following the Supreme Court's dismissal of BlueCrest Capital Management's appeal, a £200m defeat that has raised the prospect of substantial backdated tax liabilities across the industry, according to a report by the Financial Times. The court unanimously ruled that most of the hedge fund's 80 to 100 disputed partners should be treated as employees for tax purposes, and only four individuals were found to qualify as genuine partners under the relevant rules.
The decision centres on the UK's salaried member regulations, introduced in 2014 to prevent firms from classifying employees as self-employed partners in order to avoid employer National Insurance contributions. The rules assess partners' profit-linked remuneration, their influence over business decisions and their capital contributions. HMRC has resumed investigations into several City firms, prompting hedge funds, consultancies and law firms structured as limited liability partnerships (LLPs) to reassess the tax status of their partners.
Advisers report a sharp increase in HMRC inquiries. Firms are considering changes to partners' voting rights, management responsibilities and capital commitments to comply with the regulations. Some are also negotiating settlements over historic tax liabilities rather than pursuing litigation. Businesses found to have incorrectly classified partners could face up to six years of backdated National Insurance contributions.
The ruling could also make promotion to partner more restrictive, with firms tightening eligibility requirements or, in exceptional cases, moving individuals onto employee payrolls. William Wastie, head of professional services at Addleshaw Goddard, said firms would need to review their contractual arrangements to ensure partners meet the requirements for self-employed tax treatment. The judgment establishes a significant precedent for the hedge fund industry, increasing scrutiny of partnership arrangements and potentially raising employment costs for UK-based managers.
The decision centres on the UK's salaried member regulations, introduced in 2014 to prevent firms from classifying employees as self-employed partners in order to avoid employer National Insurance contributions. The rules assess partners' profit-linked remuneration, their influence over business decisions and their capital contributions. HMRC has resumed investigations into several City firms, prompting hedge funds, consultancies and law firms structured as limited liability partnerships (LLPs) to reassess the tax status of their partners.
Advisers report a sharp increase in HMRC inquiries. Firms are considering changes to partners' voting rights, management responsibilities and capital commitments to comply with the regulations. Some are also negotiating settlements over historic tax liabilities rather than pursuing litigation. Businesses found to have incorrectly classified partners could face up to six years of backdated National Insurance contributions.
The ruling could also make promotion to partner more restrictive, with firms tightening eligibility requirements or, in exceptional cases, moving individuals onto employee payrolls. William Wastie, head of professional services at Addleshaw Goddard, said firms would need to review their contractual arrangements to ensure partners meet the requirements for self-employed tax treatment. The judgment establishes a significant precedent for the hedge fund industry, increasing scrutiny of partnership arrangements and potentially raising employment costs for UK-based managers.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.