Key Takeaways
- • Paul Tudor Jones forecasts accelerating inflation driven by unprecedented peacetime fiscal stimulus (5% budget deficit as percentage of GDP), drawing parallels to late-1960s monetary conditions that preceded the inflationary cycle of the 1970s.
- • The legendary hedge fund manager explicitly recommends avoiding bonds, which he characterizes as "the most expensive they've ever been by virtually any metric," and predicts 10-year Treasury yields will reach 3.75% and 30-year yields 4.5% by year-end 2018.
- • Jones criticizes the Trump administration's corporate tax cut and Congressional spending bill as policy mistakes that will be regretted, citing the paradox of fiscal stimulus during the third-longest economic expansion in U.S. history.
- • The investor advocates positioning capital in cash and commodities/hard assets rather than traditional fixed income, reflecting his expectation of inflation and currency depreciation.
- • This rare public commentary from Jones—who famously called the October 1987 market crash—provides institutional investors with a contrarian framework for portfolio construction in an environment he views as inflationary and structurally overvalued in bonds.
Summary
Paul Tudor Jones delivered a pointed macroeconomic warning in a Goldman Sachs interview distributed to the bank's institutional clients on March 1, 2018. The renowned hedge fund manager, known for his prescient call on the 1987 crash, criticized the confluence of tax policy and spending legislation as creating dangerous structural imbalances in the U.S. economy.
Jones objected to the corporate tax cut and budget spending bill passed by Congress, emphasizing that these measures produced a projected budget deficit equivalent to 5% of GDP—a threshold he characterized as "unprecedented in peace time outside of recessions." His concern centers on the cyclical timing: the stimulus arrives during the third-longest economic expansion in U.S. history, which he views as economically indefensible. He stated unambiguously that investors "will all look back on and regret" these fiscal decisions.
The core of Jones's thesis centers on inflation expectations. He drew an explicit historical parallel to the late 1960s, when policymakers deployed low interest rates and fiscal stimulus to maintain full employment while funding the Vietnam War. That regime, he notes, preceded sustained inflationary pressure. Today, with no recession and no war justifying stimulus, Jones argues the economy is "setting the stage for accelerating inflation" through identical policy mechanisms. This inflation dynamic drives his asset allocation recommendations directly.
Jones's bond market view is particularly severe. He asserts bonds are overvalued and over-owned "by virtually any metric," warranting avoidance. His specific forecast calls for 10-year Treasury yields to reach 3.75% and 30-year yields to reach 4.5% by year-end, which he explicitly characterizes as "conservative targets." He invokes sovereign debt crises as historical precedent, noting that markets eventually discipline fiscal excess—citing Greece's experience and suggesting U.S. Treasury markets may be entering a similar disciplinary phase.
Given this macroeconomic framework, Jones recommends investors deploy capital into cash and commodities or hard assets—a defensive posture that reflects expectation of both inflation and equity market stress. The interview's rarity amplifies its institutional significance; Jones rarely engages with media, making this Goldman Sachs distribution a valuable window into the thought process of one of finance's most respected contrarian minds.
Jones objected to the corporate tax cut and budget spending bill passed by Congress, emphasizing that these measures produced a projected budget deficit equivalent to 5% of GDP—a threshold he characterized as "unprecedented in peace time outside of recessions." His concern centers on the cyclical timing: the stimulus arrives during the third-longest economic expansion in U.S. history, which he views as economically indefensible. He stated unambiguously that investors "will all look back on and regret" these fiscal decisions.
The core of Jones's thesis centers on inflation expectations. He drew an explicit historical parallel to the late 1960s, when policymakers deployed low interest rates and fiscal stimulus to maintain full employment while funding the Vietnam War. That regime, he notes, preceded sustained inflationary pressure. Today, with no recession and no war justifying stimulus, Jones argues the economy is "setting the stage for accelerating inflation" through identical policy mechanisms. This inflation dynamic drives his asset allocation recommendations directly.
Jones's bond market view is particularly severe. He asserts bonds are overvalued and over-owned "by virtually any metric," warranting avoidance. His specific forecast calls for 10-year Treasury yields to reach 3.75% and 30-year yields to reach 4.5% by year-end, which he explicitly characterizes as "conservative targets." He invokes sovereign debt crises as historical precedent, noting that markets eventually discipline fiscal excess—citing Greece's experience and suggesting U.S. Treasury markets may be entering a similar disciplinary phase.
Given this macroeconomic framework, Jones recommends investors deploy capital into cash and commodities or hard assets—a defensive posture that reflects expectation of both inflation and equity market stress. The interview's rarity amplifies its institutional significance; Jones rarely engages with media, making this Goldman Sachs distribution a valuable window into the thought process of one of finance's most respected contrarian minds.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.