Key Takeaways
- • Weil, Gotshal & Manges is exploring merger options after losing corporate chair Michael Aiello and four additional partners to Cravath, with firm leadership engaged in informal talks to gauge competitor interest, though Weil maintains publicly that it is not in active merger discussions.
- • High-profile partner departures signal structural instability: Aiello (M&A chair), Matt Gilroy (M&A co-head), David Avery-Gee (London co-managing partner), and Sarah Flaherty departed to Cravath and Sullivan & Cromwell, undermining Weil's platform despite the firm's $2 billion in annual billings.
- • The collapse of lockstep compensation has accelerated partner mobility: With major firms including Davis Polk and Cravath abandoning pure lockstep models, partner compensation is now individualized and market-driven, with top rainmakers commanding compensation packages reaching $20 million or higher, creating financial incentives for lateral moves.
- • Weil's growth strategy faces internal resistance: Aiello, despite his rainmaking status, had reportedly opposed aggressive expansion and was described as territorial about his practice, though his departure is now being reframed internally as an opportunity for entrepreneurial growth rather than a strategic loss.
- • The legal services M&A market is accelerating: Industry-wide partner departures and firm consolidation discussions reflect a broader structural shift in BigLaw, where firms unable to retain top talent or fund competitive compensation packages are increasingly open to merger discussions.
Summary
The trigger for this strategic review is the departure of Michael Aiello, chair of Weil's approximately 600-lawyer corporate department and a management committee member, along with M&A co-head Matt Gilroy and four additional partners to Cravath. Two other corporate partners—London co-managing partner David Avery-Gee and corporate partner Sarah Flaherty—separately departed to Sullivan & Cromwell. Despite Weil's $2 billion in annual billings, the firm is attempting to stabilize its platform following the loss of its largest rainmaker.
Notably, Aiello's departure represents less of a surprise loss and more of a strategic reset. Internal sources had characterized Aiello as an obstacle to growth, citing his territorial approach to the M&A practice, skepticism about expansion initiatives, and reported resistance when his own deputy, Sachin Kohli, sought to build a West Coast M&A practice at Wilson Sonsini—a move Aiello allegedly termed "disloyal." Partners framed his exit as creating an opportunity for Weil to pursue aggressive entrepreneurial growth.
The broader context reflects a fundamental shift in BigLaw compensation structure. The traditional lockstep partnership model, which tied partner compensation to seniority and capped external mobility options, has largely dissolved across elite firms. Davis Polk and Cravath have formally abandoned pure lockstep arrangements, and industry compensation is now individualized and market-driven. Top-tier partners now command compensation packages of $20 million or higher, creating significant financial incentives for lateral movement. This structural change has accelerated partner mobility industry-wide, with no firm remaining insulated from poaching activity—evidenced by Cravath itself experiencing substantial partner departures even as it recruits Aiello.
Weil's merger exploration reflects a broader acceleration in legal services consolidation. Firms unable to retain elite talent or fund competitive compensation independently are increasingly willing to pursue strategic combinations. The firm's repeated emphasis on "strengthening its platform" suggests a recognition that organic growth and talent retention alone may prove insufficient in the current competitive environment.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.