Key Takeaways
- • Hedge funds posted their worst quarterly performance since 2022, with the sector recording a weighted average return of -1.4% in Q1 2026, ending a 13-quarter streak of positive returns, driven by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and the Iran conflict that began February 28.
- • Asia-focused long/short equity funds led sectoral declines at -7.3%, followed by Europe at -6.3% and US strategies at -4.3%, as traditional diversification offered limited protection against simultaneous equity, currency, and commodity volatility.
- • Major multi-strategy hedge funds suffered significant monthly losses in March, with Balyasny Asset Management down 4.3% for the month and ExodusPoint declining 4.5%, while Citadel's Global Fixed Income Fund fell 8.2% as crowded trades unwound rapidly across asset classes.
- • Systematic trading and macro strategies outperformed, with global macro funds gaining 8.5% and commodities strategies returning 7.1%, offsetting losses in event-driven (-5%), multi-strategy (-3.9%), and equity-focused strategies (-1.8%).
- • Despite performance headwinds, hedge funds attracted record net inflows of $24.1 billion in Q1 2026, with $69.8 billion in subscriptions offsetting $45.7 billion in redemptions, signaling sustained institutional investor confidence despite short-term volatility.
Summary
Global hedge funds experienced their steepest monthly drawdowns in over four years during March 2026, as geopolitical escalation in the Middle East and the Iran conflict triggered unprecedented cross-asset volatility. According to data from Citco covering approximately $1.3 trillion in hedge fund assets under administration, the sector posted a weighted average loss of -1.4% for the first quarter—the first quarterly decline since 2022 and the end of a 13-quarter winning streak. Gains accumulated in January and February were entirely reversed by March volatility, leaving the industry in negative territory despite robust capital inflows.
The geographic and strategic performance divergence was pronounced. Asia-focused long/short equity funds suffered the steepest losses at -7.3%, followed by European strategies declining -6.3% and US-focused funds falling -4.3%. Event-driven strategies proved most vulnerable with a -5% weighted average return for the quarter, followed by multi-strategy funds at -3.9% and equity-focused strategies at -1.8%. The performance stress reflected the rapid unwinding of crowded positioning built during 2025's strong returns. Specifically, many hedge funds held overweight equity exposure and emerging market positions combined with short US dollar bets—trades that reversed sharply as risk-off sentiment prevailed and the dollar strengthened 2% following the Iran conflict onset on February 28.
High-profile multi-strategy managers faced notable monthly drawdowns: Dmitry Balyasny's Balyasny Asset Management declined 4.3% in March (down 3.8% for the quarter), while Michael Gelband's ExodusPoint fell 4.5% in the month. Citadel, with $69 billion in assets under management as of March 1, posted mixed results—its flagship Global Fixed Income Fund fell 8.2% in March and is down 5.5% year-to-date, though its Tactical Trading fund gained 1.8% in March and has risen 5.3% year-to-date. The uneven performance underscored how traditional hedge fund diversification provided minimal protection as equities, currencies, and commodities declined simultaneously.
Certain strategies capitalized on volatility. Global macro funds delivered an 8.5% gain for the quarter, benefiting from macroeconomic dislocations and shifting interest rate expectations, while commodities strategies returned 7.1% amid rising oil prices. Fixed income arbitrage funds posted marginal positive returns of 0.1%. These gains reflected the market-driven environment where volatility and commodity inflation—rather than equity selection—dominated returns.
Critically, institutional capital allocation remained resilient despite performance declines. The hedge fund industry recorded net inflows of $24.1 billion in Q1 2026, with subscriptions of $69.8 billion substantially exceeding redemptions of $45.7 billion. Multi-strategy funds attracted the largest allocations with $10.5 billion in net inflows, followed by hybrid strategies at $8.6 billion and fund of funds at $4.9 billion. This divergence between negative short-term performance and sustained capital inflows suggests institutional investors view current volatility as a tactical opportunity rather than a structural concern about hedge fund viability.
The geographic and strategic performance divergence was pronounced. Asia-focused long/short equity funds suffered the steepest losses at -7.3%, followed by European strategies declining -6.3% and US-focused funds falling -4.3%. Event-driven strategies proved most vulnerable with a -5% weighted average return for the quarter, followed by multi-strategy funds at -3.9% and equity-focused strategies at -1.8%. The performance stress reflected the rapid unwinding of crowded positioning built during 2025's strong returns. Specifically, many hedge funds held overweight equity exposure and emerging market positions combined with short US dollar bets—trades that reversed sharply as risk-off sentiment prevailed and the dollar strengthened 2% following the Iran conflict onset on February 28.
High-profile multi-strategy managers faced notable monthly drawdowns: Dmitry Balyasny's Balyasny Asset Management declined 4.3% in March (down 3.8% for the quarter), while Michael Gelband's ExodusPoint fell 4.5% in the month. Citadel, with $69 billion in assets under management as of March 1, posted mixed results—its flagship Global Fixed Income Fund fell 8.2% in March and is down 5.5% year-to-date, though its Tactical Trading fund gained 1.8% in March and has risen 5.3% year-to-date. The uneven performance underscored how traditional hedge fund diversification provided minimal protection as equities, currencies, and commodities declined simultaneously.
Certain strategies capitalized on volatility. Global macro funds delivered an 8.5% gain for the quarter, benefiting from macroeconomic dislocations and shifting interest rate expectations, while commodities strategies returned 7.1% amid rising oil prices. Fixed income arbitrage funds posted marginal positive returns of 0.1%. These gains reflected the market-driven environment where volatility and commodity inflation—rather than equity selection—dominated returns.
Critically, institutional capital allocation remained resilient despite performance declines. The hedge fund industry recorded net inflows of $24.1 billion in Q1 2026, with subscriptions of $69.8 billion substantially exceeding redemptions of $45.7 billion. Multi-strategy funds attracted the largest allocations with $10.5 billion in net inflows, followed by hybrid strategies at $8.6 billion and fund of funds at $4.9 billion. This divergence between negative short-term performance and sustained capital inflows suggests institutional investors view current volatility as a tactical opportunity rather than a structural concern about hedge fund viability.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.