Key Takeaways
- • New England Pension has retained its investment consultant following a competitive request-for-proposal (RFP) process, demonstrating continued confidence in the advisor's strategic guidance and portfolio management capabilities.
- • This marks the second consecutive retention of the same consultant, who was previously rehired in 2019 through an identical RFP evaluation process, indicating a pattern of competitive validation and relationship continuity.
- • The retention decision reflects the pension fund's confidence in the consultant's performance metrics and alignment with the fund's long-term investment objectives across its portfolio.
Summary
New England Pension has completed a competitive investment consultant search and elected to retain its existing consultant through a formal request-for-proposal process. The decision underscores the pension fund's satisfaction with the consultant's advisory services and performance track record.
This is the second time the consultant has been retained following a formal RFP evaluation. The consultant was previously rehired in 2019 through a similar competitive process, establishing a pattern of periodic review and validation by the pension fund's leadership. The recurring use of RFP methodology indicates that New England Pension maintains institutional discipline around advisor evaluation, subjecting its investment consultant to periodic competitive benchmarking rather than automatic renewal.
The retention demonstrates that despite the availability of alternative advisors in the market, the existing consultant met or exceeded the pension fund's performance expectations and strategic requirements during the evaluation period. For institutional investors and pension fund trustees, such renewal decisions following formal competitive processes carry weight as evidence of advisor quality and service delivery.
This is the second time the consultant has been retained following a formal RFP evaluation. The consultant was previously rehired in 2019 through a similar competitive process, establishing a pattern of periodic review and validation by the pension fund's leadership. The recurring use of RFP methodology indicates that New England Pension maintains institutional discipline around advisor evaluation, subjecting its investment consultant to periodic competitive benchmarking rather than automatic renewal.
The retention demonstrates that despite the availability of alternative advisors in the market, the existing consultant met or exceeded the pension fund's performance expectations and strategic requirements during the evaluation period. For institutional investors and pension fund trustees, such renewal decisions following formal competitive processes carry weight as evidence of advisor quality and service delivery.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.