Key Takeaways
- • New Mexico's PERA redeemed approximately $100 million from Two Sigma Investments' Absolute Return Enhanced Fund in June 2026, citing organizational uncertainty despite the fund's strong performance record.
- • The Absolute Return Enhanced Fund has delivered exceptional returns, gaining 12.4% year-to-date and 15% in 2025, outperforming both PERA's benchmark and comparable funds, yet this performance was insufficient to retain the allocation.
- • Organizational instability stemming from an ongoing dispute between Two Sigma co-founders John Overdeck and David Siegel has created investor concern about governance and management direction, contributing to senior departures and internal conflicts.
- • Two Sigma has successfully secured replacement capital for the strategy, one of its largest funds, which has been closed to new investors for several years, limiting the financial impact of PERA's exit.
- • The withdrawal demonstrates institutional investors' increasing emphasis on organizational stability and governance risk alongside pure investment performance when evaluating hedge fund allocations.
Summary
The decision to exit the position is particularly notable given the fund's demonstrable investment success. The Absolute Return Enhanced Fund has generated substantial returns, gaining 12.4% year-to-date and delivering 15% returns in 2025. According to PERA's own prior assessments, the strategy outperformed both the pension's benchmark and comparable alternative funds, with Two Sigma's ability to process and analyze large datasets at scale cited as a meaningful competitive advantage. Despite this strong performance record, PERA determined that organizational risks outweighed investment merits.
The primary driver of PERA's withdrawal centers on management stability at Two Sigma. The firm has been navigating an increasingly public dispute between co-founders John Overdeck and David Siegel, who have disagreed fundamentally over management and strategic direction. These tensions have precipitated senior-level departures and internal friction, creating what PERA characterized as "too much uncertainty" with no clear resolution timeline. The dispute may ultimately be referred to arbitration, adding further uncertainty regarding governance outcomes.
Two Sigma has mitigated the capital outflow by securing replacement funding for the Absolute Return Enhanced Fund, which has been closed to new investors for several years. Nevertheless, PERA's redemption underscores a broader institutional trend: sophisticated investors increasingly evaluate hedge fund allocations through a dual lens of performance and organizational stability. Governance risk, management continuity, and strategic clarity now compete directly with alpha generation as decision criteria, particularly for large institutional allocators with fiduciary obligations.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.