Key Takeaways
- • Coromandel Capital has grown firmwide assets under management by 40% since Opalesque last spoke with the firm in February 2026, while continuing to focus exclusively on senior secured, asset-based lending to specialty-finance businesses.
- • Founding Partner Rob McGregor says competitors that chased AI-related GPU financings, data centres and VC-backed stories have stumbled, leaving a large population of specialty finance businesses still in need of growth capital.
- • Coromandel's negative list excludes loan purchases from third parties, broadly syndicated loans, subordinate or mezzanine debt, predatory loans and equity, according to McGregor.
- • Founding Partner Alex Wu says the firm reconciles reported asset values against actual cash collections using account control agreements and AI-enabled monitoring, with a tolerance band typically set at 3%.
- • The firm plans to hire an investment seat and a risk seat and continue building underwriting, portfolio monitoring, risk management and back-office infrastructure, with growth paced to demonstrated operational capacity.
Summary
Coromandel Capital has grown firmwide assets under management by 40% since Opalesque last spoke with the firm in February, according to a profile by Matthias Knab of Opalesque for New Managers. The firm continues to expand its specialty finance platform and plans to hire an investment seat and a risk seat as growth continues. Founding Partner Rob McGregor says the firm remains focused on senior secured, asset-based lending to specialty-finance businesses, while capital that might once have competed with Coromandel has moved toward GPU financings, data centres and other AI-adjacent opportunities.
McGregor argues that this shift has left a large population of less prominent specialty finance businesses still seeking growth capital. He says competitors that chased the latest trend have stumbled, which he describes as vindicating for a firm that has kept to the same deal types since its founding in March 2019. He also notes that venture capital investors generally do not favour balance-sheet lending businesses, and that a specialty finance company lacking an AI narrative or a tier-one VC shareholder struggles to raise equity and, in turn, to attract larger lenders.
The firm's model is lender finance: an institutional provider finances a lender, which then originates loans to multiple small businesses under its own underwriting. McGregor illustrates this with a $30,000 loan to a pizzeria replacing an oven, noting Coromandel's exposure is secured by hundreds or thousands of underlying receivables across a diversified borrower base. Coromandel was established with the support of an early institutional relationship and began building its capabilities in early 2020, a timing McGregor says was critical.
Coromandel's negative list excludes loan purchases from other parties, broadly syndicated loans where control is surrendered, subordinate or mezzanine debt, predatory loans and equity. McGregor says the firm will decline transactions that fail its structural or risk parameters and will not accelerate deployment simply because capital is more plentiful. Founding Partner Alex Wu describes the strategy as deliberately measured growth executed through asset selection. Citing U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data that roughly 70% of U.S. GDP is household spending, Wu says the firm has largely avoided unsecured consumer credit, credit cards and auto lending, instead focusing on selected small business receivables, specialty real estate and wireless contract receivables.
Wu distinguishes asset-based lending from cash-flow lending, arguing that an asset-based lender evaluates the full collateral pool, including composition, performance, eligibility and expected collections, which provides greater control through covenants and structure. Coromandel uses account control agreements over borrower collection accounts and AI-enabled technology to reconcile changes in reported asset value against cash received, tolerating a variance typically of 3% and tracking it over time. Wu says this framework greatly reduces fraud risk, though he acknowledges no control framework fully eliminates underwriting, operational or fraud risk. The views are those of Coromandel personnel as of October 15, 2026, and the firm is an exempt reporting adviser not registered with the SEC.
McGregor argues that this shift has left a large population of less prominent specialty finance businesses still seeking growth capital. He says competitors that chased the latest trend have stumbled, which he describes as vindicating for a firm that has kept to the same deal types since its founding in March 2019. He also notes that venture capital investors generally do not favour balance-sheet lending businesses, and that a specialty finance company lacking an AI narrative or a tier-one VC shareholder struggles to raise equity and, in turn, to attract larger lenders.
The firm's model is lender finance: an institutional provider finances a lender, which then originates loans to multiple small businesses under its own underwriting. McGregor illustrates this with a $30,000 loan to a pizzeria replacing an oven, noting Coromandel's exposure is secured by hundreds or thousands of underlying receivables across a diversified borrower base. Coromandel was established with the support of an early institutional relationship and began building its capabilities in early 2020, a timing McGregor says was critical.
Coromandel's negative list excludes loan purchases from other parties, broadly syndicated loans where control is surrendered, subordinate or mezzanine debt, predatory loans and equity. McGregor says the firm will decline transactions that fail its structural or risk parameters and will not accelerate deployment simply because capital is more plentiful. Founding Partner Alex Wu describes the strategy as deliberately measured growth executed through asset selection. Citing U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data that roughly 70% of U.S. GDP is household spending, Wu says the firm has largely avoided unsecured consumer credit, credit cards and auto lending, instead focusing on selected small business receivables, specialty real estate and wireless contract receivables.
Wu distinguishes asset-based lending from cash-flow lending, arguing that an asset-based lender evaluates the full collateral pool, including composition, performance, eligibility and expected collections, which provides greater control through covenants and structure. Coromandel uses account control agreements over borrower collection accounts and AI-enabled technology to reconcile changes in reported asset value against cash received, tolerating a variance typically of 3% and tracking it over time. Wu says this framework greatly reduces fraud risk, though he acknowledges no control framework fully eliminates underwriting, operational or fraud risk. The views are those of Coromandel personnel as of October 15, 2026, and the firm is an exempt reporting adviser not registered with the SEC.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.