Key Takeaways
- • Ray Dalio emphasizes that currency movements—not headline equity index gains—were the dominant driver of real purchasing power outcomes in 2025, with dollar strength artificially inflating nominal US equity returns while masking weak real performance in other assets.
- • Long-term expected equity returns have collapsed to 4.7%, now below bond yields at approximately 4.9%, indicating investors are pricing in negative real equity returns of negative 5% to negative 10% over the next five to ten years—a sub-10th percentile valuation.
- • Currency hedging decisions proved decisive to portfolio outcomes; investors who remained unhedged against dollar appreciation faced significant erosion in real wealth despite nominal gains, while those holding non-US stocks and non-US bonds substantially outperformed their US counterparts.
- • Real asset depreciation masked by currency devaluation affected bonds particularly acutely, as fixed-income instruments—promises to deliver money—experienced declining real worth despite nominal price appreciation when measured in weakening currency units.
- • Non-US equities and non-US bonds significantly outperformed US assets in 2025, a reversal many investors failed to anticipate; gold repricing in response to currency depreciation rather than fundamental excitement underscores the centrality of monetary and fiscal policy to asset allocation.
Summary
The strategic implication is stark for asset allocation. Dalio identifies currency exposure and hedging discipline as coequal to equity selection in driving outcomes, arguing that "whether or not you are currency hedged matters a lot." In an environment dominated by aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus—particularly US dollar-supporting policies—remaining unhedged against currency movements constituted an implicit directional bet. This distinction becomes critical when considering that long-term expected equity returns have compressed to 4.7%, now falling below bond yields at 4.9%, implying negative real equity returns of negative 5% to negative 10% over the next five to ten years. This represents a sub-10th percentile valuation level, suggesting limited upside from current entry points.
Fixed-income investors faced a parallel erosion dynamic. Bonds, as promises to deliver money, lose real purchasing power when currency values decline, even as nominal prices appreciate. An investor focused only on coupon income and price appreciation would miss the critical fact that the real value of promised repayment has deteriorated. This explains why traditional safe assets disappointed investors who ignored inflation-adjusted outcomes.
The most striking performance divergence emerged in international equities. Dalio observes that investors would have substantially preferred non-US stocks to US stocks, and non-US bonds to US bonds and US cash. This preference hierarchy reflects both currency mechanics and relative valuation exposure. Assets priced in currencies that held value relative to the dollar—or denominated in hard assets like gold—captured the actual shift in wealth that nominal US index performance obscured.
For 2026, Dalio identifies currency purchasing power as the paramount political and economic issue, signaling that this framework will likely remain dominant in asset selection and portfolio construction for institutional investors navigating continued fiscal and monetary policy divergence across major economies.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.