Key Takeaways
- • Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), a senior member of the Congressional Judiciary Committee, introduced six Articles of Impeachment against Chief Justice John Roberts on May 21, 2026, citing violations of his oath and ethical obligations.
- • Cohen's primary grievance centers on the Supreme Court's refusal to adopt a binding code of ethics and what he characterizes as the Court operating as a political instrument rather than an impartial judicial body.
- • One specific allegation involves Roberts failing to fully report assets on financial disclosures, according to Article Six of the impeachment resolution (H.Res.1309).
- • Cohen asserts that at least six justices on the Roberts Court have prioritized partisan interests over constitutional principles, undermining the principle that no one is above the law.
- • The impeachment push represents an intensification of political debate surrounding Supreme Court ethics and composition, occurring during a committee markup on a Constitutional Amendment addressing high court composition.
Summary
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Memphis), a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee, formally introduced six Articles of Impeachment against Chief Justice John Roberts on May 21, 2026, during a committee markup session addressing Constitutional Amendment proposals on Supreme Court composition. The action marks an escalation in congressional scrutiny of the Chief Justice and the broader Roberts Court's institutional governance and ethical practices.
Cohen's impeachment resolution (H.Res.1309) centers on allegations that Roberts has violated his constitutional oath and ethical obligations. In his remarks before the committee, Cohen stated that the Roberts Court has failed to maintain the institutional integrity expected of the Supreme Court, asserting that at least six justices operate without proper ethical constraints. The congressman characterized the Court as having become "a political arm" that "meddles in politics in pursuit of partisan interests," rather than adhering to foundational constitutional principles of impartiality and equal application of law.
The specific charges include financial disclosure violations. Article Six of the impeachment resolution alleges that Chief Justice Roberts violated "ethical and statutory obligations by failing to fully report assets on his financial disclosures," suggesting that asset transparency deficiencies form part of Cohen's evidentiary basis for the impeachment push.
Cohen's primary concern focuses on the Supreme Court's refusal to adopt a binding code of ethics governing justices' conduct. He emphasized that the absence of enforceable ethical guidelines distinguishes the Supreme Court from other federal courts and creates what he views as institutional unaccountability. In his remarks, Cohen noted that he had previously defended the Chief Justice as capable of preserving the Court's institutional integrity, but stated that "the past several years have shown he is incapable of doing that or didn't want to."
The impeachment action occurs amid broader political debate regarding Supreme Court composition and ethics. Cohen called on fellow committee members to support removal proceedings, framing the matter as essential to upholding constitutional principles and preventing the judiciary from functioning as a partisan body.
Cohen's impeachment resolution (H.Res.1309) centers on allegations that Roberts has violated his constitutional oath and ethical obligations. In his remarks before the committee, Cohen stated that the Roberts Court has failed to maintain the institutional integrity expected of the Supreme Court, asserting that at least six justices operate without proper ethical constraints. The congressman characterized the Court as having become "a political arm" that "meddles in politics in pursuit of partisan interests," rather than adhering to foundational constitutional principles of impartiality and equal application of law.
The specific charges include financial disclosure violations. Article Six of the impeachment resolution alleges that Chief Justice Roberts violated "ethical and statutory obligations by failing to fully report assets on his financial disclosures," suggesting that asset transparency deficiencies form part of Cohen's evidentiary basis for the impeachment push.
Cohen's primary concern focuses on the Supreme Court's refusal to adopt a binding code of ethics governing justices' conduct. He emphasized that the absence of enforceable ethical guidelines distinguishes the Supreme Court from other federal courts and creates what he views as institutional unaccountability. In his remarks, Cohen noted that he had previously defended the Chief Justice as capable of preserving the Court's institutional integrity, but stated that "the past several years have shown he is incapable of doing that or didn't want to."
The impeachment action occurs amid broader political debate regarding Supreme Court composition and ethics. Cohen called on fellow committee members to support removal proceedings, framing the matter as essential to upholding constitutional principles and preventing the judiciary from functioning as a partisan body.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.