Key Takeaways
- • Saba Capital's tender offers for Blue Owl Capital Corporation II and Starwood Real Estate Income Trust generated approximately $10 million in aggregate face value across 190 trades, falling substantially short of initial expectations, with Blue Owl's offering garnering less than 1% participation.
- • The Blue Owl tender offered a 35% discount to net asset value, while Starwood's offerings ranged from 24% to 29% depending on share class; the majority of successful trades came from SREIT, indicating stronger investor interest in real estate exposure than private credit.
- • Elevated redemption activity across non-traded private-credit BDCs and interval funds continues to pressure fund managers, with Blue Owl halting quarterly redemptions in OBDC II in mid-February and capping first-quarter redemption requests at 5% across other funds, including a $5.4 billion redemption attempt.
- • Saba Capital's muted tender results suggest investors prefer holding positions or seeking alternative liquidity solutions rather than accepting steep discounts, despite hedge fund manager Boaz Weinstein's assertion that fund investors were actively seeking liquidity.
- • Starwood Capital Group and Chairman Barry Sternlicht responded by committing additional equity capital to accelerate investor redemptions, while Saba indicated plans to expand liquidity provision across additional products including Cliffwater interval funds and Blue Owl's OCIC.
Summary
The weak tender performance reflects a broader market dynamic in which private-credit funds and non-traded BDCs are experiencing elevated redemption pressures despite attempting to restrict capital outflows. Blue Owl, one of the largest players in the space, halted quarterly redemptions in OBDC II in mid-February, pivoting instead to periodic capital returns through portfolio asset sales. The fund manager faced further pressure in the first quarter when investors submitted $5.4 billion in redemption requests across two of its other private-credit funds; Blue Owl capped these requests at 5%, consistent with peer-group practices. This redemption wave provided the impetus for Saba's tender offer strategy. Saba Capital's Boaz Weinstein stated to CNBC that the firm was "hearing from investors in these funds that they wanted their money back," prompting the liquidity initiative.
The tender offer's failure to gain traction suggests investors are unwilling to crystallize losses at the proposed discount levels, despite facing uncertain redemption timelines and restricted access to capital. This stance diverges from Saba's initial thesis regarding market opportunity. In response to redemption pressures, Starwood Capital Group and Chairman Barry Sternlicht announced plans to inject additional equity capital into SREIT to accelerate investor redemptions, signaling confidence in the fund's underlying value while addressing liquidity concerns. Saba indicated it would expand its liquidity provision strategy across additional non-traded BDCs and interval funds, including Cliffwater interval funds and Blue Owl's OCIC, and simultaneously deployed capital into other alternative asset managers' publicly traded securities, acquiring $40 million in FS KKR Capital Corp. and $75 million in Bluerock Private Real Estate Fund at significant discounts to net asset value.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.