Key Takeaways
- • Mark Nathan, head of fundamental research at Regal Funds Management, identifies two sectors positioned to weather current market turbulence driven by technology sell-offs, oil supply disruptions, and AI-related economic uncertainty.
- • Regal is selectively deploying capital into "beaten up stocks" that the fund manager assesses as insulated from AI disruption risks, signaling a sector rotation away from high-valuation technology equities.
- • Market conditions are being compared to historical precedents including the 1970s oil shock and early 2000s volatility, with Nathan suggesting current dynamics represent cyclical rather than unprecedented disruption.
- • The investment thesis reflects a fundamental shift toward value-oriented positioning as institutional capital reassesses technology sector sustainability amid broader economic concerns around oil supply and AI's disruptive trajectory.
Summary
Regal Funds Management's head of fundamental research Mark Nathan is positioning the firm's portfolio to capitalize on market dislocations triggered by converging macroeconomic and technological pressures. As of March 23, 2026, Nathan has identified two specific sectors as defensive positions capable of weathering the ongoing technology sector sell-off, colloquially termed the "tech wreck."
The current market environment is characterized by multiple headwinds: an acute oil supply disruption presenting inflationary risks reminiscent of 1970s stagflation dynamics, coupled with fundamental questions about artificial intelligence's economic disruptiveness. These pressures have created significant equity repricing, particularly in technology-exposed segments. Nathan's commentary suggests investors are drawing historical parallels to both the 1970s oil shock and early 2000s valuation resets, though he frames current conditions within a cyclical rather than structural paradigm.
Regal's opportunistic strategy focuses on accumulating "beaten up stocks" in sectors the firm believes possess structural resilience to AI-driven disruption. Rather than wholesale technology sector avoidance, this approach reflects sector-level selectivity and disciplined capital deployment into depressed valuations. The positioning indicates a broader rotation underway among active managers toward value-oriented equities and away from growth-dependent technology positions vulnerable to margin compression from automation and AI integration.
The dual focus on oil dynamics and AI disruption suggests Nathan's thesis encompasses both near-term macroeconomic hedges (energy-adjacent sectors benefiting from supply constraints) and longer-term structural positioning (sectors insulated from technological displacement). This approach contrasts with passive or momentum-driven strategies that may amplify technology sector concentration risk during periods of elevated uncertainty.
The current market environment is characterized by multiple headwinds: an acute oil supply disruption presenting inflationary risks reminiscent of 1970s stagflation dynamics, coupled with fundamental questions about artificial intelligence's economic disruptiveness. These pressures have created significant equity repricing, particularly in technology-exposed segments. Nathan's commentary suggests investors are drawing historical parallels to both the 1970s oil shock and early 2000s valuation resets, though he frames current conditions within a cyclical rather than structural paradigm.
Regal's opportunistic strategy focuses on accumulating "beaten up stocks" in sectors the firm believes possess structural resilience to AI-driven disruption. Rather than wholesale technology sector avoidance, this approach reflects sector-level selectivity and disciplined capital deployment into depressed valuations. The positioning indicates a broader rotation underway among active managers toward value-oriented equities and away from growth-dependent technology positions vulnerable to margin compression from automation and AI integration.
The dual focus on oil dynamics and AI disruption suggests Nathan's thesis encompasses both near-term macroeconomic hedges (energy-adjacent sectors benefiting from supply constraints) and longer-term structural positioning (sectors insulated from technological displacement). This approach contrasts with passive or momentum-driven strategies that may amplify technology sector concentration risk during periods of elevated uncertainty.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.